TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27701:2019vsISO 27017:2015

See exactly how ISO 27701:2019 controls map to ISO 27017:2015. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

30
Controls Mapped
106
Gaps Found
22%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27701:2019 maps to ISO 27017:2015 with 22% coverage across 30 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 136 ISO 27701:2019 controls identifies 106 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Additional ISO/IEC 27002 guidance for PII controllers – ISO 27701:2019.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 136 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 30 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

PIMS-specific guidance related to ISO/IEC 27002 – ISO 27701:2019(20 mappings)

iso-27701-2019::6.10.1Network security management
→iso-27017-2015::13.1Network security management
iso-27701-2019::6.10.2Information transfer
→iso-27017-2015::13.2Information transfer
iso-27701-2019::6.11.1Security requirements of information systems
→iso-27017-2015::14.1Security requirements of information systems
iso-27701-2019::6.11.2Security in development and support processes
→iso-27017-2015::14.2Security in development and support processes
iso-27701-2019::6.11.3Test data
→iso-27017-2015::14.3Test data
iso-27701-2019::6.12Supplier relationships
→iso-27017-2015::4.2Supplier relationships in cloud services
iso-27701-2019::6.12.2Supplier service delivery management
→iso-27017-2015::15.2Supplier service delivery management
iso-27701-2019::6.13.1Management of information security incidents and improvements
→iso-27017-2015::16.1Management of information security incidents and improvements
iso-27701-2019::6.14.1Information security continuity
→iso-27017-2015::17.1Information security continuity
iso-27701-2019::6.15.1Compliance with legal and contractual requirements
→iso-27017-2015::18.1Compliance with legal and contractual requirements
iso-27701-2019::6.15.2Information security reviews
→iso-27017-2015::18.2Information security reviews
iso-27701-2019::6.2.1Management direction for information security
→iso-27017-2015::5.1Management direction for information security
iso-27701-2019::6.3.1Internal organization
→iso-27017-2015::6.1Internal organization
iso-27701-2019::6.3.2Mobile devices and teleworking
→iso-27017-2015::6.2Mobile devices and teleworking
iso-27701-2019::6.4.1Prior to employment
→iso-27017-2015::7.1Prior to employment
iso-27701-2019::6.4.2During employment
→iso-27017-2015::7.2During employment
iso-27701-2019::6.5.1Responsibility for assets
→iso-27017-2015::8.1Responsibility for assets
iso-27701-2019::6.5.2Information classification
→iso-27017-2015::8.2Information classification
iso-27701-2019::6.6.1Business requirements of access control
→iso-27017-2015::9.1Business requirements of access control
iso-27701-2019::6.6.2User access management
→iso-27017-2015::9.2User access management

+10 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 723 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 27701:2019 comparisons

ISO 27701:2019 vs ISO 9001:201549 mappingsISO 27701:2019 vs ISO 22000:201845 mappingsISO 27701:2019 vs ISO 22301:201939 mappingsISO 27701:2019 vs ISO 14001:201538 mappingsISO 27701:2019 vs ISO 45001:201837 mappingsISO 27701:2019 vs ISO 37301:202137 mappingsISO 27701:2019 vs ISO/IEC 42001:202335 mappingsISO 27701:2019 vs ISO 37001:201634 mappings

Other ISO 27017:2015 comparisons

ISO 27018:2019 vs ISO 27017:201521 mappingsISO 27043 vs ISO 27017:20158 mappingsISO/SAE 21434 vs ISO 27017:20158 mappingsISO 27002:2022 vs ISO 27017:20156 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs ISO 27017:20155 mappingsISO 19011:2018 vs ISO 27017:20155 mappingsISO 27018 vs ISO 27017:20153 mappingsISO/IEC 27018:2019 vs ISO 27017:20153 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 27701:2019 and ISO 27017:2015?

ISO 27701:2019 has 136 controls across its framework, while ISO 27017:2015 covers 42 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 30 overlapping controls (22% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Additional ISO/IEC 27002 guidance for PII controllers – ISO 27701:2019, where 36 ISO 27701:2019 controls have no direct ISO 27017:2015 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27701:2019 and ISO 27017:2015?

Of 136 total ISO 27701:2019 controls, 30 map directly to ISO 27017:2015 controls — representing 22% coverage. The remaining 106 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27701:2019 to ISO 27017:2015?

106 ISO 27701:2019 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27017:2015. The highest concentration of gaps is in Additional ISO/IEC 27002 guidance for PII controllers – ISO 27701:2019 with 36 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27701:2019 and ISO 27017:2015?

The domain with the highest gap count is Additional ISO/IEC 27002 guidance for PII controllers – ISO 27701:2019 (36 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.