TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 19011:2018vsISO 27017:2015

See exactly how ISO 19011:2018 controls map to ISO 27017:2015. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
47
Gaps Found
13%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 19011:2018 maps to ISO 27017:2015 with 13% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 55 ISO 19011:2018 controls identifies 48 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Conducting an audit – ISO 19011:2018.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 55 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Managing an audit programme – ISO 19011:2018(2 mappings)

iso-19011-2018::5.5.7Managing and maintaining audit programme records2 targets
→iso-27017-2015::4.4Managing information security risks in cloud services
→iso-27017-2015::5.1Management direction for information security

Conducting an audit – ISO 19011:2018(4 mappings)

iso-19011-2018::6.4.3Conducting opening meeting
→iso-27017-2015::12.3Backup
iso-19011-2018::6.4.5Audit information availability and access
→iso-27017-2015::9.4System and application access control
iso-19011-2018::6.5.2Distributing audit report
→iso-27017-2015::7.2During employment
iso-19011-2018::6.7Conducting audit follow-up
→iso-27017-2015::12.3Backup

Competence and evaluation of auditors – ISO 19011:2018(2 mappings)

iso-19011-2018::7.2Determining auditor competence
→iso-27017-2015::7.2During employment
iso-19011-2018::7.2.3Knowledge and skills
→iso-27017-2015::12.3Backup

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 19011:2018 comparisons

ISO 19011:2018 vs ISO 14001:201546 mappingsISO 19011:2018 vs ISO 14004:201643 mappingsISO 19011:2018 vs ISO 31000:201842 mappingsISO 19011:2018 vs ISO 45001:201839 mappingsISO 19011:2018 vs ISO 27701:201933 mappingsISO 19011:2018 vs ISO 37301:202133 mappingsISO 19011:2018 vs ISO 13485:201633 mappingsISO 19011:2018 vs ISO 22000:201831 mappings

Other ISO 27017:2015 comparisons

ISO 27701:2019 vs ISO 27017:201530 mappingsISO 27018:2019 vs ISO 27017:201521 mappingsISO 27043 vs ISO 27017:20158 mappingsISO/SAE 21434 vs ISO 27017:20158 mappingsISO 27002:2022 vs ISO 27017:20156 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs ISO 27017:20155 mappingsISO 27018 vs ISO 27017:20153 mappingsISO/IEC 27018:2019 vs ISO 27017:20153 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 19011:2018 and ISO 27017:2015?

ISO 19011:2018 has 55 controls across its framework, while ISO 27017:2015 covers 42 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (13% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Conducting an audit – ISO 19011:2018, where 22 ISO 19011:2018 controls have no direct ISO 27017:2015 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 19011:2018 and ISO 27017:2015?

Of 55 total ISO 19011:2018 controls, 7 map directly to ISO 27017:2015 controls — representing 13% coverage. The remaining 48 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 19011:2018 to ISO 27017:2015?

48 ISO 19011:2018 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27017:2015. The highest concentration of gaps is in Conducting an audit – ISO 19011:2018 with 22 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 19011:2018 and ISO 27017:2015?

The domain with the highest gap count is Conducting an audit – ISO 19011:2018 (22 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.