ISO 27018:2019vsISO 27017:2015
See exactly how ISO 27018:2019 controls map to ISO 27017:2015. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 27018:2019 maps to ISO 27017:2015 with 27% coverage across 23 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 84 ISO 27018:2019 controls identifies 61 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Access control – ISO 27018:2019.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 84 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 23 mapped controls across 10 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.
Cryptography – ISO 27018:2019(1 mappings)
Physical and environmental security – ISO 27018:2019(3 mappings)
Operations security – ISO 27018:2019(6 mappings)
Clause 13 – ISO 27018:2019(3 mappings)
Information security incident management – ISO 27018:2019(1 mappings)
Compliance – ISO 27018:2019(2 mappings)
Information security policies – ISO 27018:2019(1 mappings)
Organization of information security – ISO 27018:2019(1 mappings)
Clause 7 – ISO 27018:2019(1 mappings)
Access control – ISO 27018:2019(1 mappings)
+3 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 723 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 27018:2019 comparisons
Other ISO 27017:2015 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 723 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 27018:2019 and ISO 27017:2015?
ISO 27018:2019 has 84 controls across its framework, while ISO 27017:2015 covers 42 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 23 overlapping controls (27% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Access control – ISO 27018:2019, where 12 ISO 27018:2019 controls have no direct ISO 27017:2015 equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 27018:2019 and ISO 27017:2015?
Of 84 total ISO 27018:2019 controls, 23 map directly to ISO 27017:2015 controls — representing 27% coverage. The remaining 61 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27018:2019 to ISO 27017:2015?
61 ISO 27018:2019 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27017:2015. The highest concentration of gaps is in Access control – ISO 27018:2019 with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27018:2019 and ISO 27017:2015?
The domain with the highest gap count is Access control – ISO 27018:2019 (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.