Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27002:2022vsEU Cyber Resilience Act

See exactly how ISO 27002:2022 controls map to EU Cyber Resilience Act. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
86
Gaps Found
4%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27002:2022 maps to EU Cyber Resilience Act with 4% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 93 ISO 27002:2022 controls identifies 105 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Organizational controls – ISO 27002:2022.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 93 controls analysed | 849 frameworks | 314K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 314K+ mappings across 849 frameworks.

Organizational controls – ISO 27002:2022(5 mappings)

iso-27002-2022::5.34Privacy and protection of PII
→eu-cyber-resilience-act::Annex I Part I(2)(g)Data minimisation
iso-27002-2022::5.5Contact with authorities4 targets
→eu-cyber-resilience-act::Art. 14(1)Notifying actively exploited vulnerabilities to the CSIRT and ENISA
→eu-cyber-resilience-act::Art. 14(2)(a)Early warning within 24 hours of awareness of an exploited vulnerability
→eu-cyber-resilience-act::Art. 14(2)(b)Vulnerability notification within 72 hours
→eu-cyber-resilience-act::Art. 14(2)(c)Final report on the exploited vulnerability within 14 days of a fix

Technological controls – ISO 27002:2022(2 mappings)

iso-27002-2022::8.10Information deletion
→eu-cyber-resilience-act::Annex I Part I(2)(m)Secure permanent removal of data and settings, and secure transfer
iso-27002-2022::8.29Security testing in development and acceptance
→eu-cyber-resilience-act::Annex VII 6Technical file: test reports
Coverage crosswalk

A ISO 27002:2022 to EU Cyber Resilience Act crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which EU Cyber Resilience Act controls your existing ISO 27002:2022 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

ISO 27002:2022 into EU Cyber Resilience Act
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

EU Cyber Resilience Act into ISO 27002:2022
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

ISO 27002:2022 to EU Cyber Resilience Act (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 4% in the header counts how many ISO 27002:2022 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many EU Cyber Resilience Act controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 849 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 849 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (314K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 27002:2022 and EU Cyber Resilience Act?

ISO 27002:2022 has 93 controls across its framework, while EU Cyber Resilience Act covers 164 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (4% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Organizational controls – ISO 27002:2022, where 35 ISO 27002:2022 controls have no direct EU Cyber Resilience Act equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27002:2022 and EU Cyber Resilience Act?

Of 93 total ISO 27002:2022 controls, 4 map directly to EU Cyber Resilience Act controls, representing 4% coverage. The remaining 105 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27002:2022 to EU Cyber Resilience Act?

105 ISO 27002:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in EU Cyber Resilience Act. The highest concentration of gaps is in Organizational controls – ISO 27002:2022 with 35 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27002:2022 and EU Cyber Resilience Act?

The domain with the highest gap count is Organizational controls – ISO 27002:2022 (35 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.