TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27001:2022vsISO/IEC 27010:2015

See exactly how ISO 27001:2022 controls map to ISO/IEC 27010:2015. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

37
Controls Mapped
69
Gaps Found
15%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27001:2022 maps to ISO/IEC 27010:2015 with 15% coverage across 17 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 106 ISO 27001:2022 controls identifies 101 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in A.8 Technological Controls.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 106 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 37 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

A.5 Organizational Controls(20 mappings)

ISO27001-A.5.10Permitted use of organisational assets2 targets
→27010-8.1Membership Onboarding
→27010-8.1Membership Onboarding
ISO27001-A.5.12Data sensitivity classification scheme2 targets
→27010-8.2Membership Termination
→27010-8.2Membership Termination
ISO27001-A.5.15Logical access governance4 targets
→27010-9.1Access Control to Shared Information
→27010-9.1Access Control to Shared Information
→27010-9.2Authentication of Sources
→27010-9.2Authentication of Sources
ISO27001-A.5.16User identity lifecycle management2 targets
→27010-9.2Authentication of Sources
→27010-9.2Authentication of Sources
ISO27001-A.5.19Third-party security risk management2 targets
→27010-15.1Incident Management
→27010-15.1Incident Management
ISO27001-A.5.20Security clauses in supplier contracts2 targets
→27010-15.1Incident Management
→27010-15.1Incident Management
ISO27001-A.5.22Supplier performance and change monitoring2 targets
→27010-15.1Incident Management
→27010-15.1Incident Management
ISO27001-A.5.24Incident response planning and readiness2 targets
→27010-16.1Continuity of Sharing
→27010-16.1Continuity of Sharing
ISO27001-A.5.26Incident containment and remediation2 targets
→27010-16.1Continuity of Sharing
→27010-16.1Continuity of Sharing

+17 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 700 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 27001:2022 comparisons

ISO 27001:2022 vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 578 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs SOC 272 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs NAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668)67 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.066 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs GDPR42 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.135 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange26 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs C5 (Germany)24 mappings

Other ISO/IEC 27010:2015 comparisons

TISAX - Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs ISO/IEC 27010:201511 mappingsProtective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs ISO/IEC 27010:201510 mappingsTelecommunications Sector Security Reforms (TSSR) vs ISO/IEC 27010:20159 mappingsUK Gambling Commission - Cyber Resilience Requirements vs ISO/IEC 27010:20159 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs ISO/IEC 27010:20158 mappingsSingapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) vs ISO/IEC 27010:20158 mappingsISO 28001:2007 Supply Chain Security Management vs ISO/IEC 27010:20158 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs ISO/IEC 27010:20158 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 700 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 27001:2022 and ISO/IEC 27010:2015?

ISO 27001:2022 has 106 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27010:2015 covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 17 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in A.8 Technological Controls, where 32 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27010:2015 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27001:2022 and ISO/IEC 27010:2015?

Of 106 total ISO 27001:2022 controls, 17 map directly to ISO/IEC 27010:2015 controls — representing 15% coverage. The remaining 101 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27001:2022 to ISO/IEC 27010:2015?

101 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27010:2015. The highest concentration of gaps is in A.8 Technological Controls with 32 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27001:2022 and ISO/IEC 27010:2015?

The domain with the highest gap count is A.8 Technological Controls (32 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.