Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 22320:2018vsNRF Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Framework (National Retail Federation)

See exactly how ISO 22320:2018 controls map to NRF Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Framework (National Retail Federation). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
32
Gaps Found
11%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 22320:2018 maps to NRF Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Framework (National Retail Federation) with 11% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 ISO 22320:2018 controls identifies 33 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management(2 mappings)

ISO-22320-4.3Risk-based approach2 targets
NRFCS-1Retail Cybersecurity Governance, Policy, and Regulatory Change Management
NRFCS-2Risk Assessment, Customer Data Inventory, Classification, and Retail Threat Model

Clause 5: Basic Components - Process and Structure(1 mappings)

ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process
NRFCS-7Detection, Logging, Incident Response, Breach Notification, and Fraud Detection

Annexes: Guidance on Incident Management Planning(2 mappings)

ISO-22320-BAnnex B: Incident management plan structure
NRFCS-7Detection, Logging, Incident Response, Breach Notification, and Fraud Detection
ISO-22320-CAnnex C: Incident management task examples
NRFCS-7Detection, Logging, Incident Response, Breach Notification, and Fraud Detection

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 22320:2018 comparisons

Other NRF Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Framework (National Retail Federation) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 706 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 22320:2018 and NRF Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Framework (National Retail Federation)?

ISO 22320:2018 has 37 controls across its framework, while NRF Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Framework (National Retail Federation) covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (11% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management, where 7 ISO 22320:2018 controls have no direct NRF Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Framework (National Retail Federation) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 22320:2018 and NRF Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Framework (National Retail Federation)?

Of 37 total ISO 22320:2018 controls, 4 map directly to NRF Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Framework (National Retail Federation) controls — representing 11% coverage. The remaining 33 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 22320:2018 to NRF Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Framework (National Retail Federation)?

33 ISO 22320:2018 controls have no direct equivalent in NRF Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Framework (National Retail Federation). The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 22320:2018 and NRF Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Framework (National Retail Federation)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.