Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 22320:2018vsISO 39001:2012 - Road Traffic Safety Management

See exactly how ISO 22320:2018 controls map to ISO 39001:2012 - Road Traffic Safety Management. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
28
Gaps Found
8%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 22320:2018 maps to ISO 39001:2012 - Road Traffic Safety Management with 8% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 37 ISO 22320:2018 controls identifies 34 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 37 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

Clause 5: Basic Components - Process and Structure(9 mappings)

ISO-22320-5.1General process requirements3 targets
ISO-41001-4.1Understanding the organization and its context
ISO-41001-4.3Determining the scope of the FM management system
ISO-56002-4.3Determining the scope of the innovation management system
ISO-22320-5.3Incident management structure (command)3 targets
ISO-41001-4.1Understanding the organization and its context
ISO-41001-4.3Determining the scope of the FM management system
ISO-56002-4.3Determining the scope of the innovation management system
ISO-22320-5.4Roles and responsibilities3 targets
ISO-41001-4.1Understanding the organization and its context
ISO-41001-4.3Determining the scope of the FM management system
ISO-56002-4.3Determining the scope of the innovation management system

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 22320:2018 comparisons

Other ISO 39001:2012 - Road Traffic Safety Management comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 706 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 22320:2018 and ISO 39001:2012 - Road Traffic Safety Management?

ISO 22320:2018 has 37 controls across its framework, while ISO 39001:2012 - Road Traffic Safety Management covers 169 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (8% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management, where 8 ISO 22320:2018 controls have no direct ISO 39001:2012 - Road Traffic Safety Management equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 22320:2018 and ISO 39001:2012 - Road Traffic Safety Management?

Of 37 total ISO 22320:2018 controls, 3 map directly to ISO 39001:2012 - Road Traffic Safety Management controls — representing 8% coverage. The remaining 34 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 22320:2018 to ISO 39001:2012 - Road Traffic Safety Management?

34 ISO 22320:2018 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 39001:2012 - Road Traffic Safety Management. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 22320:2018 and ISO 39001:2012 - Road Traffic Safety Management?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 4: Principles of Incident Management (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.