Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 22000:2018vsISO 56002

See exactly how ISO 22000:2018 controls map to ISO 56002. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

93
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
21%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 22000:2018 maps to ISO 56002 with 21% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 70 ISO 22000:2018 controls identifies 55 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation – ISO 22000:2018.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 70 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 93 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Improvement – ISO 22000:2018(13 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::10.1Nonconformity and corrective action6 targets
ISO-22313-10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
ISO-37002-10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
ISO-39001-10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
ISO-41001-10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
ISO-50001-10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
ISO-56002-10.2Deviation, nonconformity and corrective action
iso-22000-2018::10.2Continual improvement7 targets
ISO-22313-10.2Continual improvement
ISO-37002-10.2Continual improvement
ISO-39001-10.2Continual improvement
ISO-41001-10.2Continual improvement
ISO-50001-10.2Continual improvement
ISO-56002-10.3Continual improvement
ISO56002-10.2Continual improvement

Context of the organization – ISO 22000:2018(7 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::4.1Understanding the organization and its context7 targets
ISO-22313-4.1Understanding the organization and its context
ISO-37002-4.1Understanding the organization and its context
ISO-39001-4.1Understanding the organization and its context
ISO-41001-4.1Understanding the organization and its context
ISO-50001-4.1Understanding the organization and its context
ISO-56002-4.1Understanding the organization and its context
ISO56002-4.1Understanding the organization and its context

+73 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 723 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 723 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 22000:2018 and ISO 56002?

ISO 22000:2018 has 70 controls across its framework, while ISO 56002 covers 164 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (21% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation – ISO 22000:2018, where 21 ISO 22000:2018 controls have no direct ISO 56002 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 22000:2018 and ISO 56002?

Of 70 total ISO 22000:2018 controls, 15 map directly to ISO 56002 controls — representing 21% coverage. The remaining 55 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 22000:2018 to ISO 56002?

55 ISO 22000:2018 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 56002. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation – ISO 22000:2018 with 21 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 22000:2018 and ISO 56002?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation – ISO 22000:2018 (21 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.