TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 22000:2018vsISO 37001:2016

See exactly how ISO 22000:2018 controls map to ISO 37001:2016. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

34
Controls Mapped
36
Gaps Found
47%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 22000:2018 maps to ISO 37001:2016 with 47% coverage across 33 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 70 ISO 22000:2018 controls identifies 37 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation – ISO 22000:2018.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 70 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 34 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Improvement – ISO 22000:2018(2 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
→iso-37001-2016::10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
iso-22000-2018::10.2Continual improvement
→iso-37001-2016::10.2Continual improvement

Context of the organization – ISO 22000:2018(4 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::4.1Understanding the organization and its context
→iso-37001-2016::4.1Understanding the organization and its context
iso-22000-2018::4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
→iso-37001-2016::4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of stakeholders
iso-22000-2018::4.3Determining the scope of the food safety management system
→iso-37001-2016::4.3Determining the scope of the anti-bribery management system
iso-22000-2018::4.4Food safety management system
→iso-37001-2016::4.4Anti-bribery management system

Leadership – ISO 22000:2018(3 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::5.1Leadership and commitment
→iso-37001-2016::5.1Leadership and commitment
iso-22000-2018::5.2Policy
→iso-37001-2016::5.2Anti-bribery policy
iso-22000-2018::5.3Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities
→iso-37001-2016::5.3Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities

Planning – ISO 22000:2018(2 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::6.1Actions to address risks and opportunities
→iso-37001-2016::6.1Actions to address risks and opportunities
iso-22000-2018::6.2Objectives of the food safety management system and planning to achieve them
→iso-37001-2016::6.2Anti-bribery objectives andISO planning

Support – ISO 22000:2018(7 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::7.2Competence
→iso-37001-2016::7.2Competence
iso-22000-2018::7.3Awareness
→iso-37001-2016::7.3Awareness and training
iso-22000-2018::7.4Communication
→iso-37001-2016::7.4Communication
iso-22000-2018::7.5Documented information
→iso-37001-2016::7.5Documented information
iso-22000-2018::7.5.1General
→iso-37001-2016::7.5.1General
iso-22000-2018::7.5.2Creating and updating
→iso-37001-2016::7.5.2Creating and updating
iso-22000-2018::7.5.3Control of documented information
→iso-37001-2016::7.5.3Control of documented information

Operation – ISO 22000:2018(2 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::8.1Operational planning and control
→iso-37001-2016::8.1Operational planning and control
iso-22000-2018::8.2Prerequisite programmes (PRPs)
→iso-37001-2016::8.2Due diligence

+14 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 723 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 22000:2018 comparisons

ISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 9001:201555 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 27701:201942 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 45001:201837 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 14001:201536 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 22301:201932 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 37301:202132 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO/IEC 42001:202331 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 50001:2018 - Energy Management Systems29 mappings

Other ISO 37001:2016 comparisons

ISO 37301:2021 vs ISO 37001:201634 mappingsISO 9001:2015 vs ISO 37001:201632 mappingsISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs ISO 37001:201629 mappingsISO 27701:2019 vs ISO 37001:201628 mappingsISO 22301:2019 vs ISO 37001:201627 mappingsISO 45001:2018 vs ISO 37001:201623 mappingsISO 14001:2015 vs ISO 37001:201623 mappingsISO 55001:2014 vs ISO 37001:201620 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 22000:2018 and ISO 37001:2016?

ISO 22000:2018 has 70 controls across its framework, while ISO 37001:2016 covers 41 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 33 overlapping controls (47% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation – ISO 22000:2018, where 13 ISO 22000:2018 controls have no direct ISO 37001:2016 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 22000:2018 and ISO 37001:2016?

Of 70 total ISO 22000:2018 controls, 33 map directly to ISO 37001:2016 controls — representing 47% coverage. The remaining 37 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 22000:2018 to ISO 37001:2016?

37 ISO 22000:2018 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 37001:2016. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation – ISO 22000:2018 with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 22000:2018 and ISO 37001:2016?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation – ISO 22000:2018 (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.