Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable ProcurementvsModern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)

See exactly how ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement controls map to Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

22
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
32%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement maps to Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) with 32% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 19 ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 6: Organizing the Procurement Function for Sustainability.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 19 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 22 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Clause 4: Understanding the Fundamentals of Sustainable Procurement(13 mappings)

ISO-20400-4.2Principles of sustainable procurement8 targets
7012(a)Definitions
BIPA-SEC5-1Biometric Identifier Definition
CTDPA-1Definitions
MSA-13Mandatory Reporting Obligation
MSA-14Joint Statements
MSA-15Voluntary Statements
MSA-5Definition of Modern Slavery
MSA-CommonwealthCommonwealth Entities
ISO-20400-4.3Core subjects of sustainable procurement5 targets
MSA-13Mandatory Reporting Obligation
MSA-14Joint Statements
MSA-15Voluntary Statements
MSA-5Definition of Modern Slavery
MSA-CommonwealthCommonwealth Entities

Clause 7: Integrating Sustainability into the Procurement Process(7 mappings)

ISO-20400-7.2Integrating sustainability into specifications3 targets
7012(a)Definitions
BIPA-SEC5-1Biometric Identifier Definition
CTDPA-1Definitions
ISO-20400-7.3Supplier selection2 targets
MSA-16-1bCriterion 2: Structure, Operations and Supply Chains
MSA-16-1cCriterion 3: Modern Slavery Risks
ISO-20400-7.4Contract management and review2 targets
MSA-16-1bCriterion 2: Structure, Operations and Supply Chains
MSA-16-1cCriterion 3: Modern Slavery Risks

+2 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement comparisons

Other Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement and Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)?

ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement has 19 controls across its framework, while Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) covers 39 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (32% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 6: Organizing the Procurement Function for Sustainability, where 5 ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement controls have no direct Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement and Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)?

Of 19 total ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement controls, 6 map directly to Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia) controls — representing 32% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement to Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)?

13 ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement controls have no direct equivalent in Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia). The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 6: Organizing the Procurement Function for Sustainability with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement and Modern Slavery Act 2018 (Australia)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 6: Organizing the Procurement Function for Sustainability (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.