Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable ProcurementvsISO/IEC 27003:2017

See exactly how ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement controls map to ISO/IEC 27003:2017. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

17
Controls Mapped
2
Gaps Found
37%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement maps to ISO/IEC 27003:2017 with 37% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 19 ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement controls identifies 12 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 6: Organizing the Procurement Function for Sustainability.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 19 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Clause 4: Understanding the Fundamentals of Sustainable Procurement(4 mappings)

ISO-20400-4.2Principles of sustainable procurement
ISO27003-4.3Determining the Scope of the ISMS
ISO-20400-4.5Key considerations for sustainable procurement3 targets
AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control
ISO27003-6.1Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities
ISO27003-8.3Information Security Risk Treatment

Clause 6: Organizing the Procurement Function for Sustainability(3 mappings)

ISO-20400-6.5Monitoring and continuous improvement3 targets
AS9100D-10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action
ISO27003-10.1Continual Improvement
ISO27003-10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action

Clause 7: Integrating Sustainability into the Procurement Process(10 mappings)

ISO-20400-7.2Integrating sustainability into specifications
ISO27003-4.3Determining the Scope of the ISMS
ISO-20400-7.3Supplier selection3 targets
AS9100D-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, and Services
ISO27003-4.2Understanding Needs and Expectations of Interested Parties
ISO27003-8.1Operational Planning and Control
ISO-20400-7.4Contract management and review3 targets
AS9100D-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, and Services
ISO27003-4.2Understanding Needs and Expectations of Interested Parties
ISO27003-8.1Operational Planning and Control
ISO-20400-7.5Reviewing and learning3 targets
AS9100D-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, and Services
ISO27003-4.2Understanding Needs and Expectations of Interested Parties
ISO27003-8.1Operational Planning and Control

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27003:2017 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement and ISO/IEC 27003:2017?

ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement has 19 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27003:2017 covers 57 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (37% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 6: Organizing the Procurement Function for Sustainability, where 4 ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27003:2017 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement and ISO/IEC 27003:2017?

Of 19 total ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement controls, 7 map directly to ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls — representing 37% coverage. The remaining 12 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement to ISO/IEC 27003:2017?

12 ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27003:2017. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 6: Organizing the Procurement Function for Sustainability with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement and ISO/IEC 27003:2017?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 6: Organizing the Procurement Function for Sustainability (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.