Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 14004:2016vsISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories

See exactly how ISO 14004:2016 controls map to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
43
Gaps Found
4%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 14004:2016 maps to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories with 4% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 48 ISO 14004:2016 controls identifies 46 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Support – ISO 14004:2016.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 48 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Planning – ISO 14004:2016(2 mappings)

iso-14004-2016::6.1Actions to address risks and opportunities2 targets
17025-8.5Actions to Address Risks and Opportunities
ISO-17025-8.5Actions to address risks and opportunities

Operation – ISO 14004:2016(3 mappings)

iso-14004-2016::8.1.1General guidance: Operational control3 targets
ISO-15189-6.1General
ISO-15189-7.1General
ISO-17025-6.1General

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 14004:2016 comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 14004:2016 and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?

ISO 14004:2016 has 48 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories covers 90 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (4% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Support – ISO 14004:2016, where 11 ISO 14004:2016 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 14004:2016 and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?

Of 48 total ISO 14004:2016 controls, 2 map directly to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories controls — representing 4% coverage. The remaining 46 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 14004:2016 to ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?

46 ISO 14004:2016 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories. The highest concentration of gaps is in Support – ISO 14004:2016 with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 14004:2016 and ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories?

The domain with the highest gap count is Support – ISO 14004:2016 (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.