Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 13485vsO-RAN WG11 Security Specification

See exactly how ISO 13485 controls map to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
33
Gaps Found
20%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 13485 maps to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification with 20% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 44 ISO 13485 controls identifies 35 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Product Realisation.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 44 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Resource Management(4 mappings)

6.3Information security awareness, education and training3 targets
ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul
ORANWG11-3Cryptography, TLS, SSH, IPsec, and PKI Lifecycle Management
ORANWG11-6Security Test Specifications, Certification, and Conformance
6.4Logging and Monitoring
ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul

ISO 13485: Patient Data Protection(3 mappings)

ISO13485-01ePHI access controls and authorization
ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul
ISO13485-02ePHI encryption at rest and in transit
ORANWG11-3Cryptography, TLS, SSH, IPsec, and PKI Lifecycle Management
ISO13485-05Audit trail for ePHI access
ORANWG11-7Logging, Monitoring, Incident Response, and Denial-of-Service Resilience

ISO 13485: Administrative Safeguards(1 mappings)

ISO13485-08Information access management
ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul

ISO 13485: Technical Safeguards(2 mappings)

ISO13485-12Unique user identification and authentication
ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul
ISO13485-16Transmission security and encryption
ORANWG11-3Cryptography, TLS, SSH, IPsec, and PKI Lifecycle Management

ISO 13485: Physical Safeguards(1 mappings)

ISO13485-17Facility access controls
ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 700 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 13485 and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

ISO 13485 has 44 controls across its framework, while O-RAN WG11 Security Specification covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Product Realisation, where 7 ISO 13485 controls have no direct O-RAN WG11 Security Specification equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 13485 and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

Of 44 total ISO 13485 controls, 9 map directly to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification controls — representing 20% coverage. The remaining 35 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 13485 to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

35 ISO 13485 controls have no direct equivalent in O-RAN WG11 Security Specification. The highest concentration of gaps is in Product Realisation with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 13485 and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

The domain with the highest gap count is Product Realisation (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.