TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 13485vsITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications

See exactly how ISO 13485 controls map to ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
24
Gaps Found
17%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 13485 maps to ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications with 17% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 29 ISO 13485 controls identifies 24 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISO 13485: Administrative Safeguards.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 29 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Resource Management(1 mappings)

6.4Logging and Monitoring
→X805-Dim2-Authentication-Identity-Verification-Claimed-Identities-Entities-CommunicationITU-T X.805 Security Dimension 2 - Authentication + Identity Verification + Claimed Identity + Entity Authentication + Data Origin Authentication + Mutual Authentication + Multi-Factor + Cryptographic Authentication

ISO 13485: Patient Data Protection(1 mappings)

ISO13485-01ePHI access controls and authorization
→X805-Dim1-Access-Control-RBAC-Authorization-Resources-Network-Elements-Services-ApplicationsITU-T X.805 Security Dimension 1 - Access Control + Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) + Authorization + Resources + Network Elements + Services + Applications + Access Limitations + Authorized Personnel + Discretionary + Mandatory Access Control

ISO 13485: Administrative Safeguards(1 mappings)

ISO13485-08Information access management
→X805-Dim1-Access-Control-RBAC-Authorization-Resources-Network-Elements-Services-ApplicationsITU-T X.805 Security Dimension 1 - Access Control + Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) + Authorization + Resources + Network Elements + Services + Applications + Access Limitations + Authorized Personnel + Discretionary + Mandatory Access Control

ISO 13485: Technical Safeguards(1 mappings)

ISO13485-12Unique user identification and authentication
→X805-Dim2-Authentication-Identity-Verification-Claimed-Identities-Entities-CommunicationITU-T X.805 Security Dimension 2 - Authentication + Identity Verification + Claimed Identity + Entity Authentication + Data Origin Authentication + Mutual Authentication + Multi-Factor + Cryptographic Authentication

ISO 13485: Physical Safeguards(1 mappings)

ISO13485-17Facility access controls
→X805-Dim1-Access-Control-RBAC-Authorization-Resources-Network-Elements-Services-ApplicationsITU-T X.805 Security Dimension 1 - Access Control + Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) + Authorization + Resources + Network Elements + Services + Applications + Access Limitations + Authorized Personnel + Discretionary + Mandatory Access Control

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 13485 comparisons

ISO 13485 vs NIST SP 800-6613 mappingsISO 13485 vs MDS2 (Medical Device)13 mappingsISO 13485 vs MARS-E13 mappingsISO 13485 vs ISO 2779913 mappingsISO 13485 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements12 mappingsISO 13485 vs NIST Privacy Framework12 mappingsISO 13485 vs AWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association)12 mappingsISO 13485 vs Oman National Cybersecurity Framework11 mappings

Other ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications comparisons

NIST Privacy Framework vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications4 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications4 mappingsOman National Cybersecurity Framework vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications3 mappingsNAIC Insurance Data Security Model Law (MDL-668) vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications3 mappingsMARS-E vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications3 mappingsSSAE 18 - Attestation Standards (SOC Reporting) vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications3 mappingsSOC 2 vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications3 mappingsMARS-E - Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications3 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 13485 and ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications?

ISO 13485 has 29 controls across its framework, while ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications covers 13 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (17% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISO 13485: Administrative Safeguards, where 5 ISO 13485 controls have no direct ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 13485 and ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications?

Of 29 total ISO 13485 controls, 5 map directly to ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications controls — representing 17% coverage. The remaining 24 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 13485 to ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications?

24 ISO 13485 controls have no direct equivalent in ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications. The highest concentration of gaps is in ISO 13485: Administrative Safeguards with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 13485 and ITU-T X.805 - Security Architecture for End-to-End Communications?

The domain with the highest gap count is ISO 13485: Administrative Safeguards (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.