ISO 13485vsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation
See exactly how ISO 13485 controls map to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 13485 maps to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation with 32% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 44 ISO 13485 controls identifies 30 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Product Realisation.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 44 controls analysed | 768 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 768 frameworks.
Resource Management(3 mappings)
Measurement(1 mappings)
ISO 13485: Patient Data Protection(5 mappings)
ISO 13485: Administrative Safeguards(8 mappings)
ISO 13485: Technical Safeguards(2 mappings)
ISO 13485: Physical Safeguards(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 13485 comparisons
Other FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 768 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 768 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 13485 and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?
ISO 13485 has 44 controls across its framework, while FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation covers 68 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (32% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Product Realisation, where 7 ISO 13485 controls have no direct FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 13485 and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?
Of 44 total ISO 13485 controls, 14 map directly to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls — representing 32% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 13485 to FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?
30 ISO 13485 controls have no direct equivalent in FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in Product Realisation with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 13485 and FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation?
The domain with the highest gap count is Product Realisation (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.