ISO 13485vsCustoms-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT)
See exactly how ISO 13485 controls map to Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 13485 maps to Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT) with 34% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 44 ISO 13485 controls identifies 29 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Product Realisation.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 44 controls analysed | 769 frameworks | 815K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 23 mapped controls across 8 domains. Sign up to explore all 815K+ mappings across 769 frameworks.
QMS(2 mappings)
Resource Management(1 mappings)
Product Realisation(1 mappings)
Improvement(1 mappings)
ISO 13485: Patient Data Protection(6 mappings)
ISO 13485: Administrative Safeguards(8 mappings)
ISO 13485: Technical Safeguards(1 mappings)
+3 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 769 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 13485 comparisons
Other Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 769 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 769 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (815K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 13485 and Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT)?
ISO 13485 has 44 controls across its framework, while Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT) covers 48 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (34% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Product Realisation, where 6 ISO 13485 controls have no direct Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT) equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 13485 and Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT)?
Of 44 total ISO 13485 controls, 15 map directly to Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT) controls — representing 34% coverage. The remaining 29 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 13485 to Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT)?
29 ISO 13485 controls have no direct equivalent in Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT). The highest concentration of gaps is in Product Realisation with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 13485 and Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism (C-TPAT)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Product Realisation (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.