ISMAP (Japan)vsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)
See exactly how ISMAP (Japan) controls map to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISMAP (Japan) maps to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) with 50% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 ISMAP (Japan) controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 25 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
ISMAP Cloud Infrastructure(4 mappings)
ISMAP Cloud Operations(9 mappings)
ISMAP Data Protection(6 mappings)
ISMAP Identity + Access(1 mappings)
+5 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other ISMAP (Japan) comparisons
Other NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISMAP (Japan) and NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?
ISMAP (Japan) has 8 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination, where 1 ISMAP (Japan) controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) equivalent.
How many controls map between ISMAP (Japan) and NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?
Of 8 total ISMAP (Japan) controls, 4 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISMAP (Japan) to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?
4 ISMAP (Japan) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). The highest concentration of gaps is in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISMAP (Japan) and NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?
The domain with the highest gap count is ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.