Cross-Framework Mapping

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)vsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)

See exactly how FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls map to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

22
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
27%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) maps to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) with 27% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 11 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls identifies 8 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 11 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 22 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

FTC Safeguards Rule: 9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Encryption, MFA, Disposal, Change, Monitoring, Pen Test (314.4(c))(12 mappings)

FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))12 targets
171A-AC-02Assess Access Enforcement
171A-AC-04Assess Separation of Duties
171A-AC-06Assess Remote Access Controls
171A-AC-07Assess Wireless Access Controls
171A-AU-02Assess Audit Record Review and Reporting
171A-AU-03Assess Audit Record Protection
171A-AU-04Assess Audit Record Retention
171A-CM-02Assess Configuration Change Control
171A-IA-01Assess Identification and Authentication
171A-MP-01Assess Media Protection
171A-SC-02Assess Cryptographic Protection
171A-SC-03Assess Communications Protection

FTC Safeguards Rule: Written Incident Response Plan, Board Reporting and FTC Breach Notification (314.4(h-j))(4 mappings)

FTC-Safeguards-IR-Plan-BoardReporting-FTC-NotificationWritten Incident Response Plan + Board Reporting + FTC Breach Notification (16 CFR 314.4(h), (i), (j))4 targets
171A-CM-01Assess Baseline Configuration
171A-IR-01Assess Incident Handling
171A-IR-02Assess Incident Response Testing
171A-SI-01Assess Flaw Remediation

FTC Safeguards Rule: Service Provider Oversight and Program Evaluation (314.4(d-g))(4 mappings)

FTC-Safeguards-ServiceProvider-EvaluationService Provider Oversight + Program Evaluation + Personnel Training (16 CFR 314.4(d-g))4 targets
171A-AT-01Assess Security Awareness Training
171A-AT-02Assess Role-Based Security Training
171A-CM-01Assess Baseline Configuration
171A-IA-02Assess Multi-Factor Authentication

+2 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) has 11 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (27% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination), where 5 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) equivalent.

How many controls map between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?

Of 11 total FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls, 3 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) controls — representing 27% coverage. The remaining 8 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?

8 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). The highest concentration of gaps is in FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination) with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?

The domain with the highest gap count is FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination) (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.