TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISMAP (Japan)vsISO/IEC 27031:2011

See exactly how ISMAP (Japan) controls map to ISO/IEC 27031:2011. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
25%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISMAP (Japan) maps to ISO/IEC 27031:2011 with 25% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 ISMAP (Japan) controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

ISMAP Cloud Governance(4 mappings)

ISMAP-CloudGovernance-ISMS-RiskAssessment-SharedResponsibility-Policy-RegulatoryCompliance-RolesResponsibilitiesISMAP Cloud Governance - ISMS per ISO 27001/JIS Q 27001 + Risk Assessment + Shared Responsibility Model + Cloud Security Policy + Regulatory Compliance + Roles and Responsibilities4 targets
→27031-5.1IRBC Policy
→27031-5.1IRBC Policy
→27031-7.2Resource Requirements
→27031-7.2Resource Requirements

ISMAP Data Protection(6 mappings)

ISMAP-DataProtection-Classification-Encryption-DataResidencyJapan-Backup-SecureDeletion-Cryptography-FIPSISMAP Data Protection - Data Classification + AES-256 Encryption At Rest + TLS 1.3 In Transit + Data Residency Japan + Backup + Secure Deletion + Cryptography per FIPS 140-3 + CRYPTREC + KMS HSM6 targets
→27031-8.1Exercising and Testing
→27031-8.1Exercising and Testing
→27031-8.2Maintaining IRBC
→27031-8.2Maintaining IRBC
→27031-9.3Management Review
→27031-9.3Management Review

Related Comparisons

Other ISMAP (Japan) comparisons

ISMAP (Japan) vs OWASP Top 10:20255 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs OWASP ASVS5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs MITRE D3FEND5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs BSI IT-Grundschutz5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs Azure Security Benchmark5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements5 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs ISO/IEC 27011:20245 mappings

Other ISO/IEC 27031:2011 comparisons

PSD2 SCA vs ISO/IEC 27031:20118 mappingsOSFI B-13 vs ISO/IEC 27031:20118 mappingsOpen Banking Security vs ISO/IEC 27031:20118 mappingsMonetary Authority of Singapore Technology Risk Management Guidelines vs ISO/IEC 27031:20118 mappingsHKMA SPM vs ISO/IEC 27031:20118 mappingsGLBA vs ISO/IEC 27031:20118 mappingsPCI P2PE vs ISO/IEC 27031:20118 mappingsPCI PIN Security vs ISO/IEC 27031:20118 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISMAP (Japan) and ISO/IEC 27031:2011?

ISMAP (Japan) has 8 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27031:2011 covers 27 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination, where 1 ISMAP (Japan) controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27031:2011 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISMAP (Japan) and ISO/IEC 27031:2011?

Of 8 total ISMAP (Japan) controls, 2 map directly to ISO/IEC 27031:2011 controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISMAP (Japan) to ISO/IEC 27031:2011?

6 ISMAP (Japan) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27031:2011. The highest concentration of gaps is in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISMAP (Japan) and ISO/IEC 27031:2011?

The domain with the highest gap count is ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.