ISMAP (Japan)vsAS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence
See exactly how ISMAP (Japan) controls map to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISMAP (Japan) maps to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence with 25% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 ISMAP (Japan) controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
ISMAP Cloud Infrastructure(1 mappings)
ISMAP Data Protection(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISMAP (Japan) comparisons
Other AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISMAP (Japan) and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?
ISMAP (Japan) has 8 controls across its framework, while AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence covers 62 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (25% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination, where 1 ISMAP (Japan) controls have no direct AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence equivalent.
How many controls map between ISMAP (Japan) and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?
Of 8 total ISMAP (Japan) controls, 2 map directly to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls — representing 25% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISMAP (Japan) to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?
6 ISMAP (Japan) controls have no direct equivalent in AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. The highest concentration of gaps is in ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISMAP (Japan) and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?
The domain with the highest gap count is ISMAP Assessment + International Coordination (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.