Cross-Framework Mapping

IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication SecurityvsUS EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements

See exactly how IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security controls map to US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

1
Controls Mapped
33
Gaps Found
3%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security maps to US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements with 3% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 34 IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security controls identifies 33 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Parts 12-14: DER, Resilience, and Monitoring.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 34 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 1 of 1 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Parts 7-9: Network Management, Access Control, and Key Management(1 mappings)

62351-8Role-based access control (RBAC)
USSDWA-2Cybersecurity Practices (Assessment, Access, Network, IR)

Related Comparisons

Other IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security comparisons

Other US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security and US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements?

IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security has 34 controls across its framework, while US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements covers 3 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (3% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Parts 12-14: DER, Resilience, and Monitoring, where 3 IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security controls have no direct US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security and US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements?

Of 34 total IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security controls, 1 map directly to US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements controls — representing 3% coverage. The remaining 33 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security to US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements?

33 IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security controls have no direct equivalent in US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Parts 12-14: DER, Resilience, and Monitoring with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security and US EPA Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) - Cybersecurity Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Parts 12-14: DER, Resilience, and Monitoring (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.