Cross-Framework Mapping

IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication SecurityvsO-RAN WG11 Security Specification

See exactly how IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security controls map to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
26
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security maps to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification with 18% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 34 IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security controls identifies 28 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Parts 10-11: Architecture and XML Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 34 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Parts 12-14: DER, Resilience, and Monitoring(3 mappings)

62351-12Resilience and security recommendations for DER
ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul
62351-13Cyber-physical generation and storage resilience
ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul
62351-14Cyber security event logging
ORANWG11-7Logging, Monitoring, Incident Response, and Denial-of-Service Resilience

Parts 1-2: Introduction and Glossary(3 mappings)

62351-2Glossary of terms3 targets
ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul
ORANWG11-3Cryptography, TLS, SSH, IPsec, and PKI Lifecycle Management
ORANWG11-6Security Test Specifications, Certification, and Conformance

Parts 7-9: Network Management, Access Control, and Key Management(2 mappings)

62351-8Role-based access control (RBAC)
ORANWG11-2O-RAN Interface Security: E2, A1, O1, O2, Open Fronthaul
62351-9Cyber security key management
ORANWG11-3Cryptography, TLS, SSH, IPsec, and PKI Lifecycle Management

Related Comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 700 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security has 34 controls across its framework, while O-RAN WG11 Security Specification covers 8 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Parts 10-11: Architecture and XML Security, where 2 IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security controls have no direct O-RAN WG11 Security Specification equivalent.

How many controls map between IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

Of 34 total IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security controls, 6 map directly to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 28 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security to O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

28 IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security controls have no direct equivalent in O-RAN WG11 Security Specification. The highest concentration of gaps is in Parts 10-11: Architecture and XML Security with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security and O-RAN WG11 Security Specification?

The domain with the highest gap count is Parts 10-11: Architecture and XML Security (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.