TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication SecurityvsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security

See exactly how IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security controls map to NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
5
Gaps Found
43%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security maps to NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security with 43% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 14 IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security controls identifies 8 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Parts 10-11: Architecture and XML Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 14 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Parts 12-14: DER, Resilience, and Monitoring(5 mappings)

62351-12Resilience and security recommendations for DER2 targets
→NIST82-CTL-04OT Patch Management
→NIST82-RM-01OT-Specific Risk Management Framework
62351-13Cyber-physical generation and storage resilience2 targets
→NIST82-CTL-04OT Patch Management
→NIST82-RM-01OT-Specific Risk Management Framework
62351-14Cyber security event logging
→NIST82-CTL-03OT Audit and Monitoring

Parts 1-2: Introduction and Glossary(2 mappings)

62351-2Glossary of terms2 targets
→NIST82-IR-03OT Incident Containment
→NIST82-RM-02OT Security Program Management

Parts 7-9: Network Management, Access Control, and Key Management(2 mappings)

62351-8Role-based access control (RBAC)
→NIST82-CTL-01OT Access Control
62351-9Cyber security key management
→NIST82-OVR-04OT Vulnerability Assessment

Related Comparisons

Other IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security comparisons

IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)6 mappingsIEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security vs Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)6 mappingsIEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)6 mappingsIEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security vs GLI-33 — Gaming Laboratories International Event Wagering Systems6 mappingsIEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)6 mappingsIEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange6 mappingsIEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security vs Telecommunications Sector Security Reforms (TSSR)6 mappingsIEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)6 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security comparisons

TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security17 mappingsASD Information Security Manual (ISM) vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security17 mappingsCISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security17 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security16 mappingsAPI 1164 vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security16 mappingsIEC 62443 vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security16 mappingsDO-326A / ED-202A vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security16 mappingsCSA CCM v4 vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security16 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security and NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security?

IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security has 14 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (43% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Parts 10-11: Architecture and XML Security, where 2 IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security controls have no direct NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security equivalent.

How many controls map between IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security and NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security?

Of 14 total IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security controls, 6 map directly to NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls — representing 43% coverage. The remaining 8 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security to NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security?

8 IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security. The highest concentration of gaps is in Parts 10-11: Architecture and XML Security with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security and NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security?

The domain with the highest gap count is Parts 10-11: Architecture and XML Security (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.