Cross-Framework Mapping

IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication SecurityvsProposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)

See exactly how IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security controls map to Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
43%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security maps to Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) with 43% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 14 IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security controls identifies 8 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Parts 10-11: Architecture and XML Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 14 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Parts 12-14: DER, Resilience, and Monitoring(7 mappings)

62351-12Resilience and security recommendations for DER3 targets
EU-CRA-21Operational procedures and responsibilities
EU-CRA-22Protection from malware
EU-CRA-25Technical vulnerability management
62351-13Cyber-physical generation and storage resilience3 targets
EU-CRA-21Operational procedures and responsibilities
EU-CRA-22Protection from malware
EU-CRA-25Technical vulnerability management
62351-14Cyber security event logging
EU-CRA-24Logging and monitoring

Parts 1-2: Introduction and Glossary(1 mappings)

62351-2Glossary of terms
EU-CRA-04Roles and responsibilities definition

Parts 7-9: Network Management, Access Control, and Key Management(7 mappings)

62351-8Role-based access control (RBAC)3 targets
EU-CRA-13Authentication and password management
EU-CRA-14Privileged access management
EU-CRA-15Access review and recertification
62351-9Cyber security key management4 targets
EU-CRA-17Encryption of data at rest
EU-CRA-18Encryption of data in transit
EU-CRA-19Certificate management
EU-CRA-20Key lifecycle management

Related Comparisons

Other IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security comparisons

Other Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security and Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)?

IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security has 14 controls across its framework, while Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (43% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Parts 10-11: Architecture and XML Security, where 2 IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security controls have no direct Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) equivalent.

How many controls map between IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security and Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)?

Of 14 total IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security controls, 6 map directly to Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) controls — representing 43% coverage. The remaining 8 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security to Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)?

8 IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security controls have no direct equivalent in Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA). The highest concentration of gaps is in Parts 10-11: Architecture and XML Security with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security and Proposal for a Regulation on Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Parts 10-11: Architecture and XML Security (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.