Cross-Framework Mapping

IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication SecurityvsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)

See exactly how IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security controls map to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
3
Gaps Found
43%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security maps to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) with 43% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 14 IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security controls identifies 8 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Parts 10-11: Architecture and XML Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 14 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Parts 12-14: DER, Resilience, and Monitoring(5 mappings)

62351-12Resilience and security recommendations for DER2 targets
DSPF-INFO-1Information Classification
PSPF-INFO-2Security Classification System
62351-13Cyber-physical generation and storage resilience2 targets
DSPF-INFO-1Information Classification
PSPF-INFO-2Security Classification System
62351-14Cyber security event logging
GLI33-4.4Audit Trail and Logging

Parts 1-2: Introduction and Glossary(1 mappings)

62351-2Glossary of terms
EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security

Parts 7-9: Network Management, Access Control, and Key Management(5 mappings)

62351-8Role-based access control (RBAC)3 targets
DSPF-INFO-3Information Access Controls
EIOPA-GL-8Logical Security
TISAX-IS-01ISMS Requirements
62351-9Cyber security key management2 targets
GLI33-4.3Data Protection and Encryption
TISAX-IS-01ISMS Requirements

Related Comparisons

Other IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security comparisons

Other EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?

IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security has 14 controls across its framework, while EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) covers 50 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (43% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Parts 10-11: Architecture and XML Security, where 2 IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security controls have no direct EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) equivalent.

How many controls map between IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?

Of 14 total IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security controls, 6 map directly to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls — representing 43% coverage. The remaining 8 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security to EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?

8 IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security controls have no direct equivalent in EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023). The highest concentration of gaps is in Parts 10-11: Architecture and XML Security with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between IEC 62351 — Power Systems Communication Security and EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Parts 10-11: Architecture and XML Security (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.