TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication SecurityvsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

9
Controls Mapped
25
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 12% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 34 IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security controls identifies 30 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Parts 12-14: DER, Resilience, and Monitoring.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 34 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 9 of 9 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Parts 12-14: DER, Resilience, and Monitoring(1 mappings)

62351-14Cyber security event logging
→3.3.1Audit Record Creation

Parts 1-2: Introduction and Glossary(3 mappings)

62351-2Glossary of terms3 targets
→3.3Configure Data Access Control Lists
→FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
→FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup

Parts 7-9: Network Management, Access Control, and Key Management(5 mappings)

62351-8Role-based access control (RBAC)2 targets
→3.10Encrypt Sensitive Data in Transit
→3.7.1Key generation procedures
62351-9Cyber security key management3 targets
→FEDRAMP-SC-13Cryptographic Protection
→FEDRAMP-SC-28Protection of Information at Rest
→FEDRAMP-SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity

Related Comparisons

Other IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security comparisons

IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification6 mappingsIEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security6 mappingsIEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security vs MTCS (Singapore)6 mappingsIEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security vs NIST Privacy Framework5 mappingsIEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)5 mappingsIEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security vs ISO 27001:20225 mappingsIEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security vs ISO 20000-15 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements18 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements17 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements17 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements16 mappingsISO 13485 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements16 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security has 34 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Parts 12-14: DER, Resilience, and Monitoring, where 2 IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 34 total IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security controls, 4 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

30 IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Parts 12-14: DER, Resilience, and Monitoring with 2 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between IEC 62351 - Power Systems Communication Security and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Parts 12-14: DER, Resilience, and Monitoring (2 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.