IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)vsISO/IEC 27400:2022
See exactly how IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls map to ISO/IEC 27400:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) maps to ISO/IEC 27400:2022 with 64% coverage across 7 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 11 IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls identifies 4 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in IAEA NSS-17 Physical + Lifecycle + Safety Interface.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 11 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
IAEA NSS-17 Access Control(3 mappings)
IAEA NSS-17 Architecture + Zones(3 mappings)
IAEA NSS-17 Assurance + Regulator + Improvement(2 mappings)
IAEA NSS-17 Detect + IR + Recovery(1 mappings)
IAEA NSS-17 Scope + CSP Establishment(2 mappings)
IAEA NSS-17 Supply Chain + Third Party(3 mappings)
IAEA NSS-17 System Integrity + Configuration(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 27400:2022 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) and ISO/IEC 27400:2022?
IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) has 11 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27400:2022 covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 7 overlapping controls (64% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in IAEA NSS-17 Physical + Lifecycle + Safety Interface, where 1 IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27400:2022 equivalent.
How many controls map between IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) and ISO/IEC 27400:2022?
Of 11 total IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls, 7 map directly to ISO/IEC 27400:2022 controls — representing 64% coverage. The remaining 4 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) to ISO/IEC 27400:2022?
4 IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27400:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in IAEA NSS-17 Physical + Lifecycle + Safety Interface with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) and ISO/IEC 27400:2022?
The domain with the highest gap count is IAEA NSS-17 Physical + Lifecycle + Safety Interface (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.