TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1)vsAS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence

See exactly how IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls map to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
7
Gaps Found
27%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) maps to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence with 27% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 11 IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls identifies 8 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in IAEA NSS-17 Assurance + Regulator + Improvement.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 11 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

IAEA NSS-17 Graded Approach + Security Levels + Risk + DBT(1 mappings)

IAEA-NSS17-GradedApproach-SecurityLevels-Risk-DBTIAEA NSS-17 - Graded Approach + Computer Security Levels + Risk-Informed Methodology + Threat Assessment + DBT Alignment + Consequence Analysis
→ISO27003-8.2Information Security Risk Assessment

IAEA NSS-17 Supply Chain + Third Party(2 mappings)

IAEA-NSS17-SupplyChain-ThirdParty-OEM-TrustIAEA NSS-17 - Supply Chain + Third Party + OEM + Vendor Security + Trustworthy Components2 targets
→AS9100D-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, Services
→ISO27003-8.1Operational Planning and Control

IAEA NSS-17 System Integrity + Configuration(1 mappings)

IAEA-NSS17-SystemIntegrity-Configuration-Change-ManagementIAEA NSS-17 - System Integrity + Configuration Management + Change Management + Baseline + Hardening
→AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control

Related Comparisons

Other IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) comparisons

IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.08 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs ISO/IEC 27400:20227 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security7 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements7 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs OWASP Top 10:20256 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)6 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs ISO/IEC 27011:20246 mappingsIAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) vs Azure Security Benchmark6 mappings

Other AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons

ISO 9001:2015 vs AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence25 mappingsISO 27701:2019 vs AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence14 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence13 mappingsISO 45001:2018 vs AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence12 mappingsISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence12 mappingsISO 22301:2019 vs AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence12 mappingsISO 37301:2021 vs AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence12 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence12 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) has 11 controls across its framework, while AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence covers 42 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (27% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in IAEA NSS-17 Assurance + Regulator + Improvement, where 1 IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls have no direct AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence equivalent.

How many controls map between IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

Of 11 total IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls, 3 map directly to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls — representing 27% coverage. The remaining 8 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) to AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

8 IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) controls have no direct equivalent in AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. The highest concentration of gaps is in IAEA NSS-17 Assurance + Regulator + Improvement with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between IAEA Nuclear Security Series - Computer Security at Nuclear Facilities (NSS-17-T Rev 1) and AS9100D:2016 - Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

The domain with the highest gap count is IAEA NSS-17 Assurance + Regulator + Improvement (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.