TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

HKMA SPMvsNIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)

See exactly how HKMA SPM controls map to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

HKMA SPM maps to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) with 18% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 11 HKMA SPM controls identifies 9 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in HKMA SPM: International Coordination (BCBS, IOSCO, FSB), 2024-2025 Pipeline (Climate, AI, DORA, ESG).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 11 controls analysed | 706 frameworks | 324K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 324K+ mappings across 706 frameworks.

HKMA SPM: Operational Risk (OR-1), Operational Resilience (OR-2), Recovery Planning (RR-1), Outsourcing (SA-2)(2 mappings)

HKMA-SPM-OR-RR-SA-OperationalResilienceHKMA SPM Operational Risk (OR-1), Operational Resilience (OR-2), Recovery Planning (RR-1), Outsourcing (SA-2)2 targets
→171A-AU-04Assess Audit Record Retention
→171A-IR-01Assess Incident Handling

HKMA SPM: Technology Management Modules (TM-G-1 to TM-G-4, TM-E-1 e-Banking) + Coordination with C-RAF(11 mappings)

HKMA-SPM-TM-Technology-TM-G-1-CRAF-CoordHKMA SPM Technology Management Modules (TM-G-1 to TM-G-4, TM-E-1) + Coordination with C-RAF11 targets
→171A-AC-06Assess Remote Access Controls
→171A-AC-07Assess Wireless Access Controls
→171A-CM-01Assess Baseline Configuration
→171A-IR-01Assess Incident Handling
→171A-IR-02Assess Incident Response Testing
→171A-MP-01Assess Media Protection
→171A-SC-01Assess Boundary Protection
→171A-SC-02Assess Cryptographic Protection
→171A-SC-03Assess Communications Protection
→171A-SI-02Assess Malicious Code Protection
→171A-SI-03Assess System Monitoring

Related Comparisons

Other HKMA SPM comparisons

HKMA SPM vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 20243 mappingsHKMA SPM vs OWASP ASVS3 mappingsHKMA SPM vs NIST Special Publication 800-34 Revision 1, Contingency Planning Guide for Federal Information Systems3 mappingsHKMA SPM vs MITRE D3FEND3 mappingsHKMA SPM vs APRA CPS 2343 mappingsHKMA SPM vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements3 mappingsHKMA SPM vs ISO/IEC 27011:20243 mappingsHKMA SPM vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar3 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)22 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)21 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)20 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)20 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)20 mappingsCISA Cross-Sector Cybersecurity Performance Goals (CPG) 2.0 vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)20 mappingsSLSA vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)19 mappingsSIG (Shared Assessments) vs NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)19 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 706 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 706 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (324K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between HKMA SPM and NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?

HKMA SPM has 11 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) covers 32 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in HKMA SPM: International Coordination (BCBS, IOSCO, FSB), 2024-2025 Pipeline (Climate, AI, DORA, ESG), where 4 HKMA SPM controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) equivalent.

How many controls map between HKMA SPM and NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?

Of 11 total HKMA SPM controls, 2 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 9 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping HKMA SPM to NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?

9 HKMA SPM controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). The highest concentration of gaps is in HKMA SPM: International Coordination (BCBS, IOSCO, FSB), 2024-2025 Pipeline (Climate, AI, DORA, ESG) with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between HKMA SPM and NIST SP 800-171A - Assessing Security Requirements for Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI)?

The domain with the highest gap count is HKMA SPM: International Coordination (BCBS, IOSCO, FSB), 2024-2025 Pipeline (Climate, AI, DORA, ESG) (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.