HKMA SPMvsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)
See exactly how HKMA SPM controls map to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
HKMA SPM maps to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) with 27% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 11 HKMA SPM controls identifies 8 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in HKMA SPM: International Coordination (BCBS, IOSCO, FSB), 2024-2025 Pipeline (Climate, AI, DORA, ESG).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 11 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
HKMA SPM: Corporate Governance (CG-1/2/3/5/6), Internal Control (IC-1/5), Auditing (AC-G)(2 mappings)
HKMA SPM: Operational Risk (OR-1), Operational Resilience (OR-2), Recovery Planning (RR-1), Outsourcing (SA-2)(2 mappings)
HKMA SPM: Technology Management Modules (TM-G-1 to TM-G-4, TM-E-1 e-Banking) + Coordination with C-RAF(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other HKMA SPM comparisons
Other NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between HKMA SPM and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?
HKMA SPM has 11 controls across its framework, while NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) covers 52 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (27% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in HKMA SPM: International Coordination (BCBS, IOSCO, FSB), 2024-2025 Pipeline (Climate, AI, DORA, ESG), where 4 HKMA SPM controls have no direct NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) equivalent.
How many controls map between HKMA SPM and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?
Of 11 total HKMA SPM controls, 3 map directly to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) controls — representing 27% coverage. The remaining 8 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping HKMA SPM to NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?
8 HKMA SPM controls have no direct equivalent in NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0). The highest concentration of gaps is in HKMA SPM: International Coordination (BCBS, IOSCO, FSB), 2024-2025 Pipeline (Climate, AI, DORA, ESG) with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between HKMA SPM and NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0)?
The domain with the highest gap count is HKMA SPM: International Coordination (BCBS, IOSCO, FSB), 2024-2025 Pipeline (Climate, AI, DORA, ESG) (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.