Cross-Framework Mapping

HIPAA Security RulevsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar

See exactly how HIPAA Security Rule controls map to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

82
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
55%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

HIPAA Security Rule maps to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar with 55% coverage across 37 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 67 HIPAA Security Rule controls identifies 30 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Physical.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 67 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 82 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.

Administrative(20 mappings)

164.306Security Standards: General Rules2 targets
→SEC01-BP03Identify and validate control objectives
→SEC07-BP02Apply data protection controls based on data sensitivity
164.308(a)(1)(i)Security Management Process (Standard)2 targets
→SEC01-BP03Identify and validate control objectives
→SEC01-BP06Automate deployment of standard security controls
164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A)Risk Analysis (Required)2 targets
→SEC01-BP07Identify threats and prioritize mitigations using a threat model
→SEC06-BP01Perform vulnerability management
164.308(a)(1)(ii)(B)Risk Management (Required)3 targets
→SEC01-BP07Identify threats and prioritize mitigations using a threat model
→SEC04-BP04Initiate remediation for non-compliant resources
→SEC06-BP01Perform vulnerability management
164.308(a)(1)(ii)(D)Information System Activity Review (Required)4 targets
→SEC02-BP05Audit and rotate credentials periodically
→SEC03-BP07Analyze public and cross-account access
→SEC04-BP02Capture logs, findings, and metrics in standardized locations
→SEC04-BP03Correlate and enrich security alerts
164.308(a)(2)Assigned Security Responsibility (Standard)
→SEC10-BP01Identify key personnel and external resources
164.308(a)(3)(i)Workforce Security (Standard)2 targets
→SEC02-BP04Rely on a centralized identity provider
→SEC03-BP06Manage access based on lifecycle
164.308(a)(3)(ii)(A)Authorization and Supervision (Addressable)3 targets
→SEC01-BP02Secure account root user and properties
→SEC03-BP01Define access requirements
→SEC06-BP03Reduce manual management and interactive access
164.308(a)(3)(ii)(C)Termination Procedures (Addressable)
→SEC03-BP06Manage access based on lifecycle

+62 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 868 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The HIPAA Security Rule to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls your existing HIPAA Security Rule work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

HIPAA Security Rule into AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar
34.9%

22 of 63 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls are evidenced by work you have already done for HIPAA Security Rule. 41 are genuine gaps.

AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar into HIPAA Security Rule
31.3%

21 of 67 HIPAA Security Rule controls are evidenced by work you have already done for AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. 46 are genuine gaps.

HIPAA Security Rule to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 55% in the header counts how many HIPAA Security Rule controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 868 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between HIPAA Security Rule and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

HIPAA Security Rule has 67 controls across its framework, while AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar covers 63 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 37 overlapping controls (55% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Physical, where 11 HIPAA Security Rule controls have no direct AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar equivalent.

How many controls map between HIPAA Security Rule and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

Of 67 total HIPAA Security Rule controls, 37 map directly to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls, representing 55% coverage. The remaining 30 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping HIPAA Security Rule to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

30 HIPAA Security Rule controls have no direct equivalent in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. The highest concentration of gaps is in Physical with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between HIPAA Security Rule and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

The domain with the highest gap count is Physical (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.