HIPAA Security RulevsAustralia My Health Records Act 2012
See exactly how HIPAA Security Rule controls map to Australia My Health Records Act 2012. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which HIPAA Security Rule controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
HIPAA Security Rule maps to Australia My Health Records Act 2012 with 51% coverage across 34 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 67 HIPAA Security Rule controls identifies 33 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Physical.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 67 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 41 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
Administrative(20 mappings)
+21 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The HIPAA Security Rule to Australia My Health Records Act 2012 crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which Australia My Health Records Act 2012 controls your existing HIPAA Security Rule work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
23 of 67 HIPAA Security Rule controls are evidenced by work you have already done for Australia My Health Records Act 2012. 44 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Requires a written policy governing how security and access to the system are managed.
Grounded in MYHR-SEC-1 Written security and access policy. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Covered entities and business associates must ensure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of all electronic protected health information (ePHI) they create, receive, maintain, or transmit; protect against reasonably anticipated...
Every one of the 23 evidenced controls and 44 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 51% in the header counts how many HIPAA Security Rule controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many Australia My Health Records Act 2012 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other HIPAA Security Rule comparisons
Other Australia My Health Records Act 2012 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between HIPAA Security Rule and Australia My Health Records Act 2012?
HIPAA Security Rule has 67 controls across its framework, while Australia My Health Records Act 2012 covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 34 overlapping controls (51% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Physical, where 11 HIPAA Security Rule controls have no direct Australia My Health Records Act 2012 equivalent.
How many controls map between HIPAA Security Rule and Australia My Health Records Act 2012?
Of 67 total HIPAA Security Rule controls, 34 map directly to Australia My Health Records Act 2012 controls, representing 51% coverage. The remaining 33 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping HIPAA Security Rule to Australia My Health Records Act 2012?
33 HIPAA Security Rule controls have no direct equivalent in Australia My Health Records Act 2012. The highest concentration of gaps is in Physical with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between HIPAA Security Rule and Australia My Health Records Act 2012?
The domain with the highest gap count is Physical (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.