Cross-Framework Mapping

GLBAvsISO 22320:2018

See exactly how GLBA controls map to ISO 22320:2018. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

23
Controls Mapped
11
Gaps Found
24%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

GLBA maps to ISO 22320:2018 with 24% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 34 GLBA controls identifies 34 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Safeguards Rule.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 34 controls analysed | 730 frameworks | 488K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 23 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 488K+ mappings across 730 frameworks.

GLBA: Information Security Governance(3 mappings)

GLBA-05Roles and responsibilities definition3 targets
ISO-22320-5.1General process requirements
ISO-22320-5.3Incident management structure (command)
ISO-22320-5.4Roles and responsibilities

Safeguards Rule(4 mappings)

GLBA-12Encryption at Rest and in Transit
ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process
GLBA-16Service Provider Oversight
ISO-22320-4.3Risk-based approach
GLBA-18Incident Response Plan
ISO-22320-4.3Risk-based approach
GLBA-19Notification of Security Event (FTC)
ISO-22320-4.3Risk-based approach

GLBA: Operational Resilience(1 mappings)

GLBA-12Encryption at Rest and in Transit
ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process

GLBA: Third-Party Risk Management(3 mappings)

GLBA-16Service Provider Oversight
ISO-22320-4.3Risk-based approach
GLBA-18Incident Response Plan
ISO-22320-4.3Risk-based approach
GLBA-19Notification of Security Event (FTC)
ISO-22320-4.3Risk-based approach

Governance(3 mappings)

GLBA-22Examination Readiness3 targets
ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process
ISO-22320-BAnnex B: Incident management plan structure
ISO-22320-CAnnex C: Incident management task examples

GLBA: Incident Management & Reporting(6 mappings)

GLBA-22Examination Readiness3 targets
ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process
ISO-22320-BAnnex B: Incident management plan structure
ISO-22320-CAnnex C: Incident management task examples
GLBA-23Regulatory reporting requirements3 targets
ISO-22320-5.2Incident management process
ISO-22320-BAnnex B: Incident management plan structure
ISO-22320-CAnnex C: Incident management task examples

+3 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 730 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 730 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 730 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (488K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between GLBA and ISO 22320:2018?

GLBA has 34 controls across its framework, while ISO 22320:2018 covers 37 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (24% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Safeguards Rule, where 10 GLBA controls have no direct ISO 22320:2018 equivalent.

How many controls map between GLBA and ISO 22320:2018?

Of 34 total GLBA controls, 13 map directly to ISO 22320:2018 controls — representing 24% coverage. The remaining 34 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping GLBA to ISO 22320:2018?

34 GLBA controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 22320:2018. The highest concentration of gaps is in Safeguards Rule with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between GLBA and ISO 22320:2018?

The domain with the highest gap count is Safeguards Rule (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.