TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Ghana Cybersecurity ActvsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how Ghana Cybersecurity Act controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

20
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Ghana Cybersecurity Act maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 50% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 12 Ghana Cybersecurity Act controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Ghana CSA: Sectoral Coordination, Budapest Convention, Malabo Convention and 2024-2025 Status.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 12 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Ghana CSA: Critical Information Infrastructure (CII) Designation, Plan, Audit and Risk Assessment(4 mappings)

GhCSA-CII-Designation-Plan-Audit-RiskCII Designation, Registration, Cybersecurity Plan, Audit and Risk Assessment4 targets
→3.10Encrypt Sensitive Data in Transit
→3.11Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest
→3.7Establish and Maintain a Data Classification Scheme
→3.7.1Key generation procedures

Ghana CSA: Cybercrime Offences, Lawful Access and Preservation(2 mappings)

GhCSA-Cybercrime-Lawful-Access-PreservationCybercrime Offences, Lawful Access and Electronic Evidence Preservation2 targets
→3.6Encrypt Data on End-User Devices
→3.6.1Incident Response Capability

Ghana CSA: Sectoral Coordination, Budapest Convention, Malabo Convention and 2024-2025 Status(7 mappings)

GhCSA-Implementation-RoadmapImplementation Roadmap - Organizational Roles, Tooling and Metrics7 targets
→3.11Encrypt Sensitive Data at Rest
→3.12Segment Data Processing and Storage Based on Sensitivity
→3.3.1Audit Record Creation
→3.6Encrypt Data on End-User Devices
→3.6.1Incident Response Capability
→FEDRAMP-CM-1Configuration Management Policy
→FEDRAMP-CM-2Baseline Configuration

Ghana CSA: Cybersecurity Incident Reporting (24-Hour to CSA) and National CERT-GH(3 mappings)

GhCSA-Incident-Reporting-CERT-GHCybersecurity Incident Reporting (24-Hour to CSA) and National CERT-GH Engagement3 targets
→3.10Encrypt Sensitive Data in Transit
→3.6Encrypt Data on End-User Devices
→3.6.1Incident Response Capability

Ghana CSA: Scope, Cyber Security Authority (CSA Ghana) and Definitions(1 mappings)

GhCSA-Scope-CSAGhana-DefsScope, Cyber Security Authority (CSA Ghana) and Key Definitions
→3.10Encrypt Sensitive Data in Transit

Ghana CSA: Cybersecurity Service Provider Licensing and Professional Accreditation(3 mappings)

GhCSA-Service-Provider-Licensing-ProfessionalCybersecurity Service Provider Licensing and Professional Accreditation3 targets
→FEDRAMP-SC-13Cryptographic Protection
→FEDRAMP-SC-28Protection of Information at Rest
→FEDRAMP-SC-8Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity

Related Comparisons

Other Ghana Cybersecurity Act comparisons

Ghana Cybersecurity Act vs AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar6 mappingsGhana Cybersecurity Act vs Privacy Act 1988 (Australia)6 mappingsGhana Cybersecurity Act vs OWASP Top 10:20256 mappingsGhana Cybersecurity Act vs Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP)6 mappingsGhana Cybersecurity Act vs Law No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data6 mappingsGhana Cybersecurity Act vs India DPDP Act6 mappingsGhana Cybersecurity Act vs IACS Unified Requirements E26/E27 - Cyber Resilience of Ships and On-Board Systems6 mappingsGhana Cybersecurity Act vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)6 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements18 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements17 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements17 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements16 mappingsISO 13485 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements16 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Ghana Cybersecurity Act and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Ghana Cybersecurity Act has 12 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Ghana CSA: Sectoral Coordination, Budapest Convention, Malabo Convention and 2024-2025 Status, where 5 Ghana Cybersecurity Act controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between Ghana Cybersecurity Act and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 12 total Ghana Cybersecurity Act controls, 6 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Ghana Cybersecurity Act to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

6 Ghana Cybersecurity Act controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Ghana CSA: Sectoral Coordination, Budapest Convention, Malabo Convention and 2024-2025 Status with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Ghana Cybersecurity Act and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Ghana CSA: Sectoral Coordination, Budapest Convention, Malabo Convention and 2024-2025 Status (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.