Cross-Framework Mapping

Ghana Cybersecurity ActvsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar

See exactly how Ghana Cybersecurity Act controls map to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
50%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Ghana Cybersecurity Act maps to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar with 50% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 12 Ghana Cybersecurity Act controls identifies 6 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Ghana CSA: Sectoral Coordination, Budapest Convention, Malabo Convention and 2024-2025 Status.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 12 controls analysed | 701 frameworks | 341K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 341K+ mappings across 701 frameworks.

Ghana CSA: Critical Information Infrastructure (CII) Designation, Plan, Audit and Risk Assessment(3 mappings)

GhCSA-CII-Designation-Plan-Audit-RiskCII Designation, Registration, Cybersecurity Plan, Audit and Risk Assessment3 targets
AWS-WA-03Cloud risk assessment
AWS-WA-07Multi-factor authentication for cloud
AWS-WA-08Privileged access in cloud environments

Ghana CSA: Cybercrime Offences, Lawful Access and Preservation(1 mappings)

GhCSA-Cybercrime-Lawful-Access-PreservationCybercrime Offences, Lawful Access and Electronic Evidence Preservation
AWS-WA-22Incident response in cloud

Ghana CSA: Sectoral Coordination, Budapest Convention, Malabo Convention and 2024-2025 Status(8 mappings)

GhCSA-Implementation-RoadmapImplementation Roadmap - Organizational Roles, Tooling and Metrics8 targets
AWS-WA-03Cloud risk assessment
AWS-WA-11Data classification for cloud
AWS-WA-19Image and template hardening
AWS-WA-20Cloud configuration management
AWS-WA-21Cloud security monitoring and logging
AWS-WA-22Incident response in cloud
AWS-WA-23Cloud vulnerability management
AWS-WA-24Cloud change management

Ghana CSA: Cybersecurity Incident Reporting (24-Hour to CSA) and National CERT-GH(1 mappings)

GhCSA-Incident-Reporting-CERT-GHCybersecurity Incident Reporting (24-Hour to CSA) and National CERT-GH Engagement
AWS-WA-22Incident response in cloud

Ghana CSA: Scope, Cyber Security Authority (CSA Ghana) and Definitions(1 mappings)

GhCSA-Scope-CSAGhana-DefsScope, Cyber Security Authority (CSA Ghana) and Key Definitions
AWS-WA-06Cloud identity management

Ghana CSA: Cybersecurity Service Provider Licensing and Professional Accreditation(1 mappings)

GhCSA-Service-Provider-Licensing-ProfessionalCybersecurity Service Provider Licensing and Professional Accreditation
AWS-WA-12Encryption of cloud-stored data

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 701 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 701 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (341K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Ghana Cybersecurity Act and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

Ghana Cybersecurity Act has 12 controls across its framework, while AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar covers 89 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (50% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Ghana CSA: Sectoral Coordination, Budapest Convention, Malabo Convention and 2024-2025 Status, where 5 Ghana Cybersecurity Act controls have no direct AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar equivalent.

How many controls map between Ghana Cybersecurity Act and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

Of 12 total Ghana Cybersecurity Act controls, 6 map directly to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls — representing 50% coverage. The remaining 6 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Ghana Cybersecurity Act to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

6 Ghana Cybersecurity Act controls have no direct equivalent in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. The highest concentration of gaps is in Ghana CSA: Sectoral Coordination, Budapest Convention, Malabo Convention and 2024-2025 Status with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Ghana Cybersecurity Act and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?

The domain with the highest gap count is Ghana CSA: Sectoral Coordination, Budapest Convention, Malabo Convention and 2024-2025 Status (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.