GDPRvsChina Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)
See exactly how GDPR controls map to China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
GDPR maps to China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) with 63% coverage across 24 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 38 GDPR controls identifies 14 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Chapter IV - Controller and Processor.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 38 controls analysed | 730 frameworks | 488K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 42 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 488K+ mappings across 730 frameworks.
Chapter III - Rights of the Data Subject(13 mappings)
Chapter IV - Controller and Processor(7 mappings)
+22 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 730 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other GDPR comparisons
Other China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 730 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 730 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (488K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between GDPR and China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)?
GDPR has 38 controls across its framework, while China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) covers 52 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 24 overlapping controls (63% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter IV - Controller and Processor, where 7 GDPR controls have no direct China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) equivalent.
How many controls map between GDPR and China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)?
Of 38 total GDPR controls, 24 map directly to China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) controls — representing 63% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping GDPR to China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)?
14 GDPR controls have no direct equivalent in China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL). The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter IV - Controller and Processor with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between GDPR and China Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter IV - Controller and Processor (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.