Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-144vsOWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)

See exactly how NIST SP 800-144 controls map to OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

10
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-144 maps to OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) with 38% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 NIST SP 800-144 controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Availability and Resilience.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 330K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 330K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Governance and Trust(5 mappings)

NISTSP144-1Cloud Governance, Risk Assessment, and Provider Trust Evaluation5 targets
DSOMM-1Culture, Organization, Education, and Governance
DSOMM-2Implementation Practices, Secure Coding, and Threat Modelling
DSOMM-3Build, Deployment, Infrastructure Hardening, and Secrets Management
DSOMM-4Test and Verification - SAST, DAST, IAST, SCA, Penetration Testing
DSOMM-6Metrics, Maturity Measurement, and Continuous Improvement

Workload and Configuration(2 mappings)

NISTSP144-7Cloud Workload Protection, Containers, Serverless, and Configuration2 targets
DSOMM-1Culture, Organization, Education, and Governance
DSOMM-3Build, Deployment, Infrastructure Hardening, and Secrets Management

Monitoring and IR(3 mappings)

NISTSP144-8Monitoring, Incident Response, Exit Strategy, and Compliance3 targets
DSOMM-1Culture, Organization, Education, and Governance
DSOMM-3Build, Deployment, Infrastructure Hardening, and Secrets Management
DSOMM-5Information Gathering, Logging, Monitoring, and Incident Response

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (330K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-144 and OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)?

NIST SP 800-144 has 8 controls across its framework, while OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) covers 6 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Availability and Resilience, where 1 NIST SP 800-144 controls have no direct OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-144 and OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)?

Of 8 total NIST SP 800-144 controls, 3 map directly to OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM) controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-144 to OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)?

5 NIST SP 800-144 controls have no direct equivalent in OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM). The highest concentration of gaps is in Availability and Resilience with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-144 and OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Availability and Resilience (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.