Cross-Framework Mapping

GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing PracticevsFDA 21 CFR Part 11

See exactly how GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice controls map to FDA 21 CFR Part 11. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
119
Gaps Found
4%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice maps to FDA 21 CFR Part 11 with 4% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 124 GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice controls identifies 119 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Chapter 6: Regulated company activities (governance and system-specific activities) – GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 124 controls analysed | 1,016 frameworks | 316K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 control mappings across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 316K+ mappings across 1,016 frameworks.

Chapter 2: Key concepts (product and process understanding, life cycle within a QMS, scalable activities, science-based QRM, leveraging suppliers) – GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice(1 mappings)

gamp-5-good-automated-manufacturing-practice::2.1.32.1.3 Scalable Life Cycle Activities
→Part11.CSVComputer system validation + risk-based approach (21 CFR §11.10(a) + 2003 FDA Scope and Application Guidance + 2023 CSA draft)

Chapter 4: Life cycle phases (concept, project, operation, retirement) – GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice(1 mappings)

gamp-5-good-automated-manufacturing-practice::4.3.84.3.8 Operation: Record Management
→Part11.RecordRetentionRecord protection + retention + readiness for inspection (21 CFR §11.10(b) + (c))

Chapter 6: Regulated company activities (governance and system-specific activities) – GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice(1 mappings)

gamp-5-good-automated-manufacturing-practice::6.1.66.1.6 Planning for Validation
→Part11.CSVComputer system validation + risk-based approach (21 CFR §11.10(a) + 2003 FDA Scope and Application Guidance + 2023 CSA draft)

Special interest appendices S1 to S6 (ASTM E2500, electronic production records, end user applications, patch management, organizational change) – GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice(2 mappings)

gamp-5-good-automated-manufacturing-practice::S2Appendix S2 Electronic Production Records
→Part11.10Controls for closed systems (21 CFR §11.10)
gamp-5-good-automated-manufacturing-practice::S3Appendix S3 End User Applications Including Spreadsheets
→Part11.CSVComputer system validation + risk-based approach (21 CFR §11.10(a) + 2003 FDA Scope and Application Guidance + 2023 CSA draft)
Coverage crosswalk

A GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice to FDA 21 CFR Part 11 crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which FDA 21 CFR Part 11 controls your existing GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice into FDA 21 CFR Part 11
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

FDA 21 CFR Part 11 into GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice to FDA 21 CFR Part 11 (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 4% in the header counts how many GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many FDA 21 CFR Part 11 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Related Comparisons

Other GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice comparisons

Other FDA 21 CFR Part 11 comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

Cross-framework mappings across 1,016 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 1,016 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (316K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice and FDA 21 CFR Part 11?

GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice has 124 controls across its framework, while FDA 21 CFR Part 11 covers 13 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (4% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter 6: Regulated company activities (governance and system-specific activities) – GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice, where 19 GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice controls have no direct FDA 21 CFR Part 11 equivalent.

How many controls map between GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice and FDA 21 CFR Part 11?

Of 124 total GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice controls, 5 map directly to FDA 21 CFR Part 11 controls, representing 4% coverage. The remaining 119 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice to FDA 21 CFR Part 11?

119 GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice controls have no direct equivalent in FDA 21 CFR Part 11. The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter 6: Regulated company activities (governance and system-specific activities) – GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice with 19 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice and FDA 21 CFR Part 11?

The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter 6: Regulated company activities (governance and system-specific activities) – GAMP 5 - Good Automated Manufacturing Practice (19 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.