Cross-Framework Mapping

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)vsISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management

See exactly how FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls map to ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

14
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
55%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) maps to ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management with 55% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 11 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 11 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 14 of 14 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

FTC Safeguards Rule: 9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Encryption, MFA, Disposal, Change, Monitoring, Pen Test (314.4(c))(1 mappings)

FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
23837-1.2Normative references

FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination)(2 mappings)

FTC-Safeguards-EffectiveDate-Small-InstitutionEffective Date, Small Institution Exemption and Sectoral Coordination (16 CFR 314.5, 314.6)2 targets
27557-4.3Individual impact consideration
27557-6.3Privacy risk assessment

FTC Safeguards Rule: Written Incident Response Plan, Board Reporting and FTC Breach Notification (314.4(h-j))(2 mappings)

FTC-Safeguards-IR-Plan-BoardReporting-FTC-NotificationWritten Incident Response Plan + Board Reporting + FTC Breach Notification (16 CFR 314.4(h), (i), (j))2 targets
27557-4.3Individual impact consideration
27557-6.3Privacy risk assessment

FTC Safeguards Rule: Written Risk Assessment (314.4(b))(2 mappings)

FTC-Safeguards-Risk-AssessmentWritten Risk Assessment (16 CFR 314.4(b))2 targets
27557-4.3Individual impact consideration
27557-6.3Privacy risk assessment

FTC Safeguards Rule: Scope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)(5 mappings)

FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)5 targets
23837-1.1Scope
27557-1Scope
27557-3Terms and definitions
27557-4.3Individual impact consideration
27557-6.2Scope, context, and criteria for privacy

FTC Safeguards Rule: Service Provider Oversight and Program Evaluation (314.4(d-g))(2 mappings)

FTC-Safeguards-ServiceProvider-EvaluationService Provider Oversight + Program Evaluation + Personnel Training (16 CFR 314.4(d-g))2 targets
27557-4.3Individual impact consideration
27557-6.3Privacy risk assessment

Related Comparisons

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 723 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management?

FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) has 11 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management covers 41 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (55% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination), where 4 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management equivalent.

How many controls map between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management?

Of 11 total FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls, 6 map directly to ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management controls — representing 55% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) to ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management?

5 FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management. The highest concentration of gaps is in FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination) with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) and ISO/IEC 27557:2022 - Organisational Privacy Risk Management?

The domain with the highest gap count is FTC Safeguards Rule: Effective Date, Small Institution Exemption and 2024-2025 Pipeline (314.5, 314.6, Coordination) (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.