Cross-Framework Mapping

French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691)vsPhilippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)

See exactly how French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) controls map to Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
12
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) maps to Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) with 14% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 14 French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) controls identifies 12 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Sapin II: HATVP Lobbying Register, Coordination with EU Whistleblower Directive + CSDDD + Status.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 14 controls analysed | 702 frameworks | 342K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 342K+ mappings across 702 frameworks.

Sapin II: Pillars 1+2 - Code of Conduct and Internal Whistleblowing System (Waserman Reform 2022)(1 mappings)

Sapin2-Pillar1-Code-of-ConductPillar 1 - Anti-Corruption Code of Conduct
RA10175-S3Definition of Terms

Sapin II: Pillars 3+4 - Corruption Risk Mapping and Third-Party Due Diligence(1 mappings)

Sapin2-Pillar4-ThirdParty-DueDiligencePillar 4 - Third-Party Due Diligence (Clients, Suppliers, Intermediaries, M&A)
RA10175-S4a5Misuse of Devices

Related Comparisons

Other French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) comparisons

Other Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 702 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 702 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (342K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) and Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)?

French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) has 14 controls across its framework, while Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Sapin II: HATVP Lobbying Register, Coordination with EU Whistleblower Directive + CSDDD + Status, where 3 French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) controls have no direct Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) equivalent.

How many controls map between French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) and Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)?

Of 14 total French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) controls, 2 map directly to Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 12 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) to Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)?

12 French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) controls have no direct equivalent in Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175). The highest concentration of gaps is in Sapin II: HATVP Lobbying Register, Coordination with EU Whistleblower Directive + CSDDD + Status with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between French Sapin II Law (Law No. 2016-1691) and Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Sapin II: HATVP Lobbying Register, Coordination with EU Whistleblower Directive + CSDDD + Status (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.