ISO/IEC 27003:2017vsPhilippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)
See exactly how ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls map to Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO/IEC 27003:2017 maps to Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) with 5% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 81 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls identifies 77 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation (Clause 8).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 81 controls analysed | 702 frameworks | 342K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 342K+ mappings across 702 frameworks.
Operation (Clause 8)(2 mappings)
Context of the Organization (Clause 4)(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 27003:2017 comparisons
Other Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 702 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 702 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (342K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)?
ISO/IEC 27003:2017 has 81 controls across its framework, while Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (5% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation (Clause 8), where 12 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls have no direct Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)?
Of 81 total ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls, 4 map directly to Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) controls — representing 5% coverage. The remaining 77 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27003:2017 to Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)?
77 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls have no direct equivalent in Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175). The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation (Clause 8) with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Operation (Clause 8) (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.