Cross-Framework Mapping

AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management SystemvsPhilippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)

See exactly how AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System controls map to Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
53
Gaps Found
7%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System maps to Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) with 7% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 57 AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System controls identifies 53 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation (Clause 8).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 57 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Operation (Clause 8)(2 mappings)

AS9100D-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, and Services
RA10175-S4a5Misuse of Devices
ISO27003-8.1Operational Planning and Control
RA10175-S4a5Misuse of Devices

Context of the Organization (Clause 4)(2 mappings)

ISO27003-4.2Understanding Needs and Expectations of Interested Parties
RA10175-S4a5Misuse of Devices
ISO27003-4.3Determining the Scope of the ISMS
RA10175-S3Definition of Terms

Related Comparisons

Other AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System comparisons

Other Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System and Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)?

AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System has 57 controls across its framework, while Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) covers 41 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (7% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation (Clause 8), where 12 AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System controls have no direct Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) equivalent.

How many controls map between AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System and Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)?

Of 57 total AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System controls, 4 map directly to Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175) controls — representing 7% coverage. The remaining 53 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System to Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)?

53 AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System controls have no direct equivalent in Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175). The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation (Clause 8) with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System and Philippines Cybercrime Prevention Act (RA 10175)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation (Clause 8) (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.