TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR)vsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)

See exactly how Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) controls map to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

8
Controls Mapped
4
Gaps Found
33%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) maps to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) with 33% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 12 Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) controls identifies 8 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Florida FDBR: Coordination with US State Privacy Laws, COPPA, FOSA and Status.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 12 controls analysed | 700 frameworks | 323K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 323K+ mappings across 700 frameworks.

Florida FDBR: Controller and Processor Obligations, DPA, Privacy Notice(2 mappings)

FDBR-ControllerObligations-DPA-NoticeController + Processor Obligations + Data Protection Assessments (Fla. Stat. 501.707, 501.708, 501.71, 501.711)2 targets
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
→FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)

Florida FDBR: Enforcement, Penalties, Cure Period and Florida AG / Department of Legal Affairs(1 mappings)

FDBR-Enforcement-AG-CurePeriodEnforcement by Florida Department of Legal Affairs + Penalties + 45-Day Cure (Fla. Stat. 501.72, 501.721, 501.722)
→FTC-Safeguards-ServiceProvider-EvaluationService Provider Oversight + Program Evaluation + Personnel Training (16 CFR 314.4(d-g))

Florida FDBR: Scope, Applicability Thresholds (USD 1B Big Tech) and Definitions(4 mappings)

FDBR-Scope-DefsScope, Applicability Thresholds and Definitions (Fla. Stat. 501.701, 501.702, 501.703, 501.704)4 targets
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))
→FTC-Safeguards-EffectiveDate-Small-InstitutionEffective Date, Small Institution Exemption and Sectoral Coordination (16 CFR 314.5, 314.6)
→FTC-Safeguards-Program-Qualified-IndividualComprehensive Information Security Program + Qualified Individual (16 CFR 314.3, 314.4(a))
→FTC-Safeguards-Scope-DefsScope, Definitions and Financial Institution Applicability (16 CFR 314.1, 314.2)

Florida FDBR: Sensitive Data, Children, Voice/Facial Recognition Opt-Out(1 mappings)

FDBR-SensitiveData-Children-VoiceFacialSensitive Data, Children's Privacy and Voice/Facial Recognition (Fla. Stat. 501.711, 501.1735)
→FTC-Safeguards-9-Elements9 Safeguard Elements - Access, Inventory, Encryption, Secure-Dev, MFA, Disposal, Change-Mgmt, Monitoring, Pen-Test (16 CFR 314.4(c))

Related Comparisons

Other Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) comparisons

Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) vs NIST SP 800-1464 mappingsFlorida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) vs NIST SP 800-1454 mappingsFlorida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) vs NIST SP 800-1444 mappingsFlorida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) vs MTCS (Singapore)4 mappingsFlorida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) vs ISMAP (Japan)4 mappingsFlorida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) vs ISO 134854 mappingsFlorida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) vs Wisconsin Data Privacy Act (SB 670)4 mappingsFlorida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) vs Tennessee Information Protection Act (TIPA)4 mappings

Other FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) comparisons

Ley Orgánica de Protección de Datos Personales (LOPDP) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsLaw No. 172-13 on the Protection of Personal Data vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIndia DPDP Act vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsIndia CERT-In Cyber Security Directions 2022 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsNIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsSwitzerland FADP vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappingsBarbados Data Protection Act 2019 vs FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)6 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 700 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 700 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (323K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) has 12 controls across its framework, while FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) covers 11 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (33% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Florida FDBR: Coordination with US State Privacy Laws, COPPA, FOSA and Status, where 6 Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) controls have no direct FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) equivalent.

How many controls map between Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

Of 12 total Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) controls, 4 map directly to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) controls — representing 33% coverage. The remaining 8 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) to FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

8 Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) controls have no direct equivalent in FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). The highest concentration of gaps is in Florida FDBR: Coordination with US State Privacy Laws, COPPA, FOSA and Status with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Florida Digital Bill of Rights (FDBR) and FTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Florida FDBR: Coordination with US State Privacy Laws, COPPA, FOSA and Status (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.