TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018)vsCosta Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP

See exactly how Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) controls map to Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

65
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
40%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) maps to Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP with 40% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Chapter 1 — General Provisions.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 65 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Chapter 1 — General Provisions(20 mappings)

152FZ-1Scope of the Federal Law (Article 1)5 targets
→Art. 12Data Ownership
→Art. 26Outsourcing of Personal Information Processing
→Art. 29Safety Measures
→Art. 29Safety Measures
→Art. 8Data Categories
Art. 2Consent Definition8 targets
→Art. 10Consent Requirements
→Art. 17Governance Structure
→Art. 4Participating Institutions
→Art. 4Participating Institutions
→Art. 7Minimum Standards
→Art. 8Data Categories
→Art. 9Free Data Sharing
→Cl. 12Right to Data Portability
Art. 4Participating Institutions3 targets
→Art. 17Governance Structure
→Art. 2Consent Definition
→Art. 8Data Categories
EPDPA-1Scope of Regulation (§1)4 targets
→Art. 12Data Ownership
→Art. 26Outsourcing of Personal Information Processing
→Art. 29Safety Measures
→Art. 29Safety Measures

+45 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) comparisons

Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) vs EU Digital Markets Act14 mappingsFinland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) vs EU In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Regulation (IVDR)14 mappingsFinland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) vs eIDAS 2.0 — EU Digital Identity Regulation14 mappingsFinland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) vs African Union Malabo Convention14 mappingsFinland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) vs Egypt Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 151 of 2020)14 mappingsFinland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) vs Chile Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 21.719)14 mappingsFinland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) vs Pakistan Personal Data Protection Bill 202314 mappingsFinland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) vs Turkey Personal Data Protection Law (KVKK — Law No. 6698)14 mappings

Other Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP comparisons

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience vs Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP15 mappingsSerbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) vs Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP14 mappingsMontenegro Law on Personal Data Protection (2023) vs Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP14 mappingsNorth Macedonia Law on Personal Data Protection (2020) vs Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP14 mappingsIceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) vs Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP14 mappingsUruguay Personal Data Protection Act (Law No. 18.331) vs Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP14 mappingsGhana Data Protection Act 2012 (Act 843) vs Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP14 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP14 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) and Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP?

Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) has 35 controls across its framework, while Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (40% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter 1 — General Provisions, where 9 Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) controls have no direct Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP equivalent.

How many controls map between Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) and Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP?

Of 35 total Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) controls, 14 map directly to Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP controls — representing 40% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) to Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP?

21 Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) controls have no direct equivalent in Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP. The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter 1 — General Provisions with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) and Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP?

The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter 1 — General Provisions (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.