Cross-Framework Mapping

Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018)vsEU Digital Markets Act

See exactly how Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) controls map to EU Digital Markets Act. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

26
Controls Mapped
9
Gaps Found
40%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) maps to EU Digital Markets Act with 40% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Chapter 1 — General Provisions.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 26 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Chapter 1 — General Provisions(13 mappings)

152FZ-1Scope of the Federal Law (Article 1)2 targets
DMA-ART5-2Prohibition on Cross-Service Data Combining
DMA-ART6-9Effective Data Portability
Art. 2Consent Definition4 targets
DMA-ART6-7Interoperability Access
DMA-ART7-1Basic Interoperability Obligation
DMA-ART7-2Phased Interoperability Requirements
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting
Art. 4Participating Institutions
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting
EPDPA-1Scope of Regulation (§1)2 targets
DMA-ART5-2Prohibition on Cross-Service Data Combining
DMA-ART6-9Effective Data Portability
Sec. 2Interpretation3 targets
DMA-ART5-2Prohibition on Cross-Service Data Combining
DMA-ART6-9Effective Data Portability
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting
Sec. 3Scope and Application
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting

Chapter 3 — Data Protection Ombudsman and Expert Board(1 mappings)

Sec. 10Powers of the Commission
US-SEC-DA-CE-02Custody and Reporting

Chapter 4 — Legal Remedies(2 mappings)

Sec. 15Duty to Register2 targets
DMA-ART5-2Prohibition on Cross-Service Data Combining
DMA-ART6-9Effective Data Portability

Chapter 5 — Specific Processing Situations(1 mappings)

Sec. 29Data Protection Council
EU-NIS2-EN-CE-01Supervisory Framework

Chapter 6 — Penalties and Final Provisions(3 mappings)

Sec. 36Right to Erasure2 targets
DMA-ART5-2Prohibition on Cross-Service Data Combining
DMA-ART6-9Effective Data Portability
Sec. 38Right to Data Portability
DMA-ART6-7Interoperability Access

+6 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) comparisons

Other EU Digital Markets Act comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) and EU Digital Markets Act?

Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) has 35 controls across its framework, while EU Digital Markets Act covers 61 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (40% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter 1 — General Provisions, where 9 Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) controls have no direct EU Digital Markets Act equivalent.

How many controls map between Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) and EU Digital Markets Act?

Of 35 total Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) controls, 14 map directly to EU Digital Markets Act controls — representing 40% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) to EU Digital Markets Act?

21 Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) controls have no direct equivalent in EU Digital Markets Act. The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter 1 — General Provisions with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) and EU Digital Markets Act?

The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter 1 — General Provisions (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.