Cross-Framework Mapping

Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018)vseIDAS 2.0 — EU Digital Identity Regulation

See exactly how Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) controls map to eIDAS 2.0 — EU Digital Identity Regulation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

71
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
40%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) maps to eIDAS 2.0 — EU Digital Identity Regulation with 40% coverage across 14 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Chapter 1 — General Provisions.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 71 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Chapter 1 — General Provisions(20 mappings)

152FZ-1Scope of the Federal Law (Article 1)7 targets
Art. 12Data Ownership
Art. 19Consent Management Controls
Art. 34Notification of Personal Information Breach
Art. 35Right of Access
Art. 44Right to Effective Judicial Remedy
Art. 8Data Categories
Sec. 40Right to Object
Art. 2Consent Definition5 targets
Art. 10Consent Requirements
Art. 17Governance Structure
Art. 7Minimum Standards
Art. 8Data Categories
Art. 9Free Data Sharing
Art. 4Participating Institutions3 targets
Art. 17Governance Structure
Art. 2Consent Definition
Art. 8Data Categories
EPDPA-1Scope of Regulation (§1)5 targets
Art. 12Data Ownership
Art. 19Consent Management Controls
Art. 34Notification of Personal Information Breach
Art. 35Right of Access
Art. 44Right to Effective Judicial Remedy

+51 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) comparisons

Other eIDAS 2.0 — EU Digital Identity Regulation comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) and eIDAS 2.0 — EU Digital Identity Regulation?

Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) has 35 controls across its framework, while eIDAS 2.0 — EU Digital Identity Regulation covers 44 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 14 overlapping controls (40% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter 1 — General Provisions, where 9 Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) controls have no direct eIDAS 2.0 — EU Digital Identity Regulation equivalent.

How many controls map between Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) and eIDAS 2.0 — EU Digital Identity Regulation?

Of 35 total Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) controls, 14 map directly to eIDAS 2.0 — EU Digital Identity Regulation controls — representing 40% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) to eIDAS 2.0 — EU Digital Identity Regulation?

21 Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) controls have no direct equivalent in eIDAS 2.0 — EU Digital Identity Regulation. The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter 1 — General Provisions with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Finland Data Protection Act (Tietosuojalaki, 1050/2018) and eIDAS 2.0 — EU Digital Identity Regulation?

The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter 1 — General Provisions (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.