TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Uruguay Personal Data Protection Act (Law No. 18.331)vsCosta Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP

See exactly how Uruguay Personal Data Protection Act (Law No. 18.331) controls map to Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

46
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
34%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Uruguay Personal Data Protection Act (Law No. 18.331) maps to Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP with 34% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 38 Uruguay Personal Data Protection Act (Law No. 18.331) controls identifies 25 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Chapter III — Rights of Data Subjects.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 38 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 46 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Chapter III — Rights of Data Subjects(11 mappings)

Art. 17Governance Structure4 targets
→Art. 2Consent Definition
→Art. 4Participating Institutions
→Art. 4Participating Institutions
→Art. 8Data Categories
Art. 19Consent Management Controls5 targets
→Art. 12Data Ownership
→Art. 26Outsourcing of Personal Information Processing
→Art. 29Safety Measures
→Art. 29Safety Measures
→Art. 8Data Categories
Art. 21Administrative Sanctions
→Art. 28Administrative Measures
Art. 25Criminal Penalties
→Art. 33Criminal Offences

Chapter I — General Provisions(9 mappings)

Art. 2Consent Definition8 targets
→Art. 10Consent Requirements
→Art. 17Governance Structure
→Art. 4Participating Institutions
→Art. 4Participating Institutions
→Art. 7Minimum Standards
→Art. 8Data Categories
→Art. 9Free Data Sharing
→Cl. 12Right to Data Portability
Art. 4Participating Institutions
→Art. 17Governance Structure

+26 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other Uruguay Personal Data Protection Act (Law No. 18.331) comparisons

Uruguay Personal Data Protection Act (Law No. 18.331) vs Albania Law on Protection of Personal Data (Law No. 9887, 2008, amended 2014)14 mappingsUruguay Personal Data Protection Act (Law No. 18.331) vs EU Network Code on Cybersecurity for the Electricity Sector13 mappingsUruguay Personal Data Protection Act (Law No. 18.331) vs Ethiopia Personal Data Protection Proclamation (No. 1321/2024)13 mappingsUruguay Personal Data Protection Act (Law No. 18.331) vs Uzbekistan Law on Personal Data (No. ZRU-547)13 mappingsUruguay Personal Data Protection Act (Law No. 18.331) vs Greece Law 4624/2019 — Hellenic Data Protection Authority (HDPA) Implementation Act13 mappingsUruguay Personal Data Protection Act (Law No. 18.331) vs Malta Data Protection Act (Cap. 586, 2018)13 mappingsUruguay Personal Data Protection Act (Law No. 18.331) vs ASEAN Data Management Framework13 mappingsUruguay Personal Data Protection Act (Law No. 18.331) vs ILO Nursing Personnel Convention C149 (1977)13 mappings

Other Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP comparisons

BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience vs Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP15 mappingsSerbia Law on Personal Data Protection (2018) vs Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP14 mappingsMontenegro Law on Personal Data Protection (2023) vs Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP14 mappingsNorth Macedonia Law on Personal Data Protection (2020) vs Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP14 mappingsIceland Data Protection and Processing of Personal Data Act (Act No. 90/2018) vs Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP14 mappingsGhana Data Protection Act 2012 (Act 843) vs Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP14 mappingsAustralia Consumer Data Right — Banking (CDR) vs Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP14 mappingsILO Nursing Personnel Convention C149 (1977) vs Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP14 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Uruguay Personal Data Protection Act (Law No. 18.331) and Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP?

Uruguay Personal Data Protection Act (Law No. 18.331) has 38 controls across its framework, while Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (34% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Chapter III — Rights of Data Subjects, where 8 Uruguay Personal Data Protection Act (Law No. 18.331) controls have no direct Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP equivalent.

How many controls map between Uruguay Personal Data Protection Act (Law No. 18.331) and Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP?

Of 38 total Uruguay Personal Data Protection Act (Law No. 18.331) controls, 13 map directly to Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP controls — representing 34% coverage. The remaining 25 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Uruguay Personal Data Protection Act (Law No. 18.331) to Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP?

25 Uruguay Personal Data Protection Act (Law No. 18.331) controls have no direct equivalent in Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP. The highest concentration of gaps is in Chapter III — Rights of Data Subjects with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Uruguay Personal Data Protection Act (Law No. 18.331) and Costa Rica Personal Data Protection Law (Law No. 8968) as amended by Executive Decree No. 42089-MGP?

The domain with the highest gap count is Chapter III — Rights of Data Subjects (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.