FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)vsO-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11)
See exactly how FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls map to O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) maps to O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) with 41% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 27 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Maturity Levels.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 27 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Domain 1: Cyber Risk Management and Oversight(1 mappings)
Domain 2: Threat Intelligence and Collaboration(2 mappings)
Domain 3: Cybersecurity Controls(3 mappings)
Domain 4: External Dependency Management(1 mappings)
Domain 5: Cyber Incident Management and Resilience(1 mappings)
Inherent Risk Profile: Risk Categories(3 mappings)
Maturity Levels(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) comparisons
Other O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11)?
FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) has 27 controls across its framework, while O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) covers 13 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (41% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Maturity Levels, where 4 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls have no direct O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) equivalent.
How many controls map between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11)?
Of 27 total FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls, 11 map directly to O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) controls — representing 41% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) to O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11)?
16 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls have no direct equivalent in O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11). The highest concentration of gaps is in Maturity Levels with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Maturity Levels (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.