TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment ExchangevsO-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11)
See exactly how TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange controls map to O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange maps to O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) with 32% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 47 TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange controls identifies 32 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Information Security.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 47 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 21 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Information Security(13 mappings)
Information Security Management(1 mappings)
Prototype and Data Protection(1 mappings)
Technical and Operational Controls(5 mappings)
+1 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange comparisons
Other O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange and O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11)?
TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange has 47 controls across its framework, while O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) covers 13 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (32% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information Security, where 23 TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange controls have no direct O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) equivalent.
How many controls map between TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange and O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11)?
Of 47 total TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange controls, 15 map directly to O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) controls — representing 32% coverage. The remaining 32 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange to O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11)?
32 TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange controls have no direct equivalent in O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11). The highest concentration of gaps is in Information Security with 23 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange and O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Information Security (23 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.