TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8)vsO-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11)

See exactly how Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) controls map to O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

18
Controls Mapped
15
Gaps Found
39%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) maps to O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) with 39% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 33 Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) controls identifies 20 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Governance.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 33 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Governance(5 mappings)

AASB-S2-6bManagement's Role in Governance
→ORAN-SEC-1.2Risk Management
IM8-GOV.2Roles and Responsibilities3 targets
→ORAN-SEC-2.1Interface Security Requirements
→ORAN-SEC-3.1TLS Implementation
→ORAN-SEC-4.1Security Test Specifications
IM8-GOV.4ICT Security Risk Management
→ORAN-SEC-1.2Risk Management

Cloud Security(1 mappings)

IM8-CLD.2Cloud Security Controls
→ORAN-SEC-3.1TLS Implementation

Data Management(1 mappings)

IM8-DAT.2Data Protection
→ORAN-SEC-2.2Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability

Digital Service Standards(2 mappings)

IM8-DSS.2Service Reliability Standards
→ORAN-SEC-2.2Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability
IM8-DSS.3Secure Development Practices
→ORAN-SEC-5.2Application Security

Resilience(4 mappings)

IM8-RES.2Disaster Recovery3 targets
→ORAN-SEC-2.1Interface Security Requirements
→ORAN-SEC-3.1TLS Implementation
→ORAN-SEC-4.1Security Test Specifications
IM8-RES.4Resilience Testing
→ORAN-SEC-2.2Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability

Architecture and Security(4 mappings)

IM8-SEC.2Access Control2 targets
→ORAN-SEC-2.1Interface Security Requirements
→ORAN-SEC-2.3Least Privilege and Zero Trust
IM8-SEC.3Network Security
→ORAN-SEC-2.3Least Privilege and Zero Trust
IM8-SEC.4Vulnerability Management
→ORAN-SEC-1.1Threat Modeling and Remediation

Third-Party Management(1 mappings)

IM8-TPM.4Supply Chain Risk Management
→ORAN-SEC-1.2Risk Management

Related Comparisons

Other Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) comparisons

Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)16 mappingsSingapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)16 mappingsSingapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 202416 mappingsSingapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) vs CSA CCM v416 mappingsSingapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)16 mappingsSingapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) vs BS 65000:2014 — Guidance on Organizational Resilience15 mappingsSingapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) vs EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)15 mappingsSingapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange15 mappings

Other O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) comparisons

CSA CCM v4 vs O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11)9 mappingsASD Information Security Manual (ISM) vs O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11)9 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11)9 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11)8 mappingsCSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) vs O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11)8 mappingsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) vs O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11)8 mappingsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 vs O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11)8 mappingsFTC GLBA Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314) vs O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11)8 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) and O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11)?

Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) has 33 controls across its framework, while O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) covers 13 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (39% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Governance, where 7 Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) controls have no direct O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) equivalent.

How many controls map between Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) and O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11)?

Of 33 total Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) controls, 13 map directly to O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11) controls — representing 39% coverage. The remaining 20 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) to O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11)?

20 Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) controls have no direct equivalent in O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11). The highest concentration of gaps is in Governance with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Singapore Government Instruction Manual on ICT&SS Management (IM8) and O-RAN Alliance Security Specifications (O-RAN.WG11)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Governance (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.